95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24074759)
1. Accuracy of a home-based device for giving an early estimate of pregnancy duration compared with reference methods.
Johnson SR; Godbert S; Perry P; Parsons P; Roberts L; Buchanan P; Larsen J; Alonzo TA; Zinaman M
Fertil Steril; 2013 Dec; 100(6):1635-41.e1. PubMed ID: 24074759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Human chorionic gonadotropin as a measure of pregnancy duration.
Larsen J; Buchanan P; Johnson S; Godbert S; Zinaman M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 123(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 24079475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of perception of ovulation day in women trying to conceive.
Zinaman M; Johnson S; Ellis J; Ledger W
Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 May; 28(5):749-54. PubMed ID: 22462529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The normal variabilities of the menstrual cycle.
Cole LA; Ladner DG; Byrn FW
Fertil Steril; 2009 Feb; 91(2):522-7. PubMed ID: 18433748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Self-prediction of ovulation using a urinary luteinizing hormone test.
Corson SL
J Reprod Med; 1986 Aug; 31(8 Suppl):760-3. PubMed ID: 3761282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Personal hormone monitoring for contraception.
Bonnar J; Flynn A; Freundl G; Kirkman R; Royston R; Snowden R
Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jan; 24(4):128-34. PubMed ID: 10023097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increased pregnancy rate with use of the Clearblue Easy Fertility Monitor.
Robinson JE; Wakelin M; Ellis JE
Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):329-34. PubMed ID: 17074329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Natural limits of pregnancy testing in relation to the expected menstrual period.
Wilcox AJ; Baird DD; Dunson D; McChesney R; Weinberg CR
JAMA; 2001 Oct; 286(14):1759-61. PubMed ID: 11594902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a semi-quantitative pregnancy device for susceptibility to interference caused by hCGβcf.
Nerenz RD; Butch AW; Ashby L; Woldemariam GA; Gronowski AM
Clin Biochem; 2015 Aug; 48(12):815-7. PubMed ID: 25916816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The accuracy and reproducibility of the endometrial receptivity array is superior to histology as a diagnostic method for endometrial receptivity.
Díaz-Gimeno P; Ruiz-Alonso M; Blesa D; Bosch N; Martínez-Conejero JA; Alamá P; Garrido N; Pellicer A; Simón C
Fertil Steril; 2013 Feb; 99(2):508-17. PubMed ID: 23102856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Home pregnancy test compared to standard-of-care ultrasound dating in the assessment of pregnancy duration.
Johnson S; Shaw R; Parkinson P; Ellis J; Buchanan P; Zinaman M
Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Feb; 27(2):393-401. PubMed ID: 21175374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance and sensitivity of modern home pregnancy tests.
Asch RH; Asch B; Asch G; Asch M; Bray R; Rojas FJ
Int J Fertil; 1988; 33(3):154, 157-8, 161. PubMed ID: 2456274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performances of urine pregnancy tests on College of American Pathologists Survey specimens.
Biesecker JL; Rippey JH
Am J Clin Pathol; 1981 Oct; 76(4 Suppl):544-6. PubMed ID: 7282640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of analytical sensitivity and women's interpretation of home pregnancy tests.
Johnson S; Cushion M; Bond S; Godbert S; Pike J
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Feb; 53(3):391-402. PubMed ID: 25274958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The ABCs of HMTs (home medical tests).
Reich M
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1987 Dec; 87(12):861-6. PubMed ID: 3429296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Day-specific probabilities of conception in fertile cycles resulting in spontaneous pregnancies.
Stirnemann JJ; Samson A; Bernard JP; Thalabard JC
Hum Reprod; 2013 Apr; 28(4):1110-6. PubMed ID: 23340057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Use of biochemical markers to predict the outcome of pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization].
Hauzman E; Murber A; Fancsovits P; Papp Z; Urbancsek J
Orv Hetil; 2006 Jul; 147(30):1409-20. PubMed ID: 16977779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Urinary-based ovulation and pregnancy: point-of-care testing.
Eichner SF; Timpe EM
Ann Pharmacother; 2004 Feb; 38(2):325-31. PubMed ID: 14742773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Background hCG in non-pregnant individuals: need for more sensitive point-of-care and over-the-counter pregnancy tests.
Cole LA; Ladner DG
Clin Biochem; 2009 Feb; 42(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 18929550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intact HCG, free HCG beta subunit and HCG beta core fragment: longitudinal patterns in urine during early pregnancy.
McChesney R; Wilcox AJ; O'Connor JF; Weinberg CR; Baird DD; Schlatterer JP; McConnaughey DR; Birken S; Canfield RE
Hum Reprod; 2005 Apr; 20(4):928-35. PubMed ID: 15665026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
