These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24074898)
1. Contralateral suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: a potential diagnostic tool to evaluate the vestibular nerve. Chang MY; Song JJ; Kim JS; Koo JW Med Hypotheses; 2013 Nov; 81(5):830-3. PubMed ID: 24074898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Separating the contributions of olivocochlear and middle ear muscle reflexes in modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emission levels. Wolter NE; Harrison RV; James AL Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24335024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and contralateral suppression findings in children with Asperger's Syndrome. Kaf WA; Danesh AA Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jun; 77(6):947-54. PubMed ID: 23562236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [A study on the contralateral suppressive effects of distortion product otoacoustic emissions]. Wang H; Zhong N Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 11(11):489-92. PubMed ID: 10323015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice. Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs]. Kong W; Yang Y; Zhang W Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression. Sun XM J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4310-20. PubMed ID: 18537382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams. Zhang F; Boettcher FA; Sun XM Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subclinical dysfunction of cochlea and cochlear efferents in migraine: an otoacoustic emission study. Bolay H; Bayazit YA; Gündüz B; Ugur AK; Akçali D; Altunyay S; Ilica S; Babacan A Cephalalgia; 2008 Apr; 28(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 18279433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the frequency selectivity of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the active mechanisms of the organ of corti by analyzing the changes in the amplitude of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products. Ibargüen AM; Santaolalla Montoya F; del Rey AS; Fernandez JM J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 19128576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postnatal maturation of contralateral DPOAE suppression in a precocious animal model (chinchilla) of the human neonate. Harrison RV; Konomi U; Kanotra S; James AL Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Apr; 133(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 23373512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative analysis of cochlear active mechanisms in tinnitus subjects with normal hearing sensitivity: multiparametric recording of evoked otoacoustic emissions and contralateral suppression. Paglialonga A; Del Bo L; Ravazzani P; Tognola G Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Jun; 37(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 19879078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neurotoxicity of BFM-95 on the medial olivocochlear bundle assessed by means of contralateral suppression of 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Riga M; Korres S; Psarommatis I; Varvutsi M; Giotakis I; Papadas T; Ferekidis E; Apostolopoulos N Otol Neurotol; 2007 Feb; 28(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 17255889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Effect of contralateral noise exposure on otoacoustic distortion product emissions in man]. Richter B; Hauser R; Löhle E Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Mar; 74(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 7755853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control. Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Increased amplitude of distortion product emissions in the human caused by contralateral low intensity acoustic stimulation]. Nieschalk M; Beneking R; Stoll W HNO; 1997 May; 45(5):378-84. PubMed ID: 9265021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear. Harrison RV; Sharma A; Brown T; Jiwani S; James AL Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18368574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Otoacoustic emissions and effects of contralateral white noise stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in diabetic children. Ugur AK; Kemaloglu YK; Ugur MB; Gunduz B; Saridogan C; Yesilkaya E; Bideci A; Cinaz P; Goksu N Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 73(4):555-9. PubMed ID: 19150138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults. Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical value of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and their contralateral suppression effects]. Wang H; Zhong N Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 13(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 12564028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]