These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
471 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24075050)
21. [Metal staples versus conventional suture for wound closure in total knee arthroplasty]. Hlubek R; Walder P; Káňa J; Salounová D Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 24945393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Abdominal skin closure using subcuticular sutures prevents incisional surgical site infection in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. Okubo S; Gotohda N; Sugimoto M; Nomura S; Kobayashi S; Takahashi S; Hayashi R; Konishi M Surgery; 2018 Aug; 164(2):251-256. PubMed ID: 29803560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A prospective randomised comparison of 2 skin closure techniques in primary total hip arthroplasty surgery. Rui M; Zheng X; Sun SS; Li CY; Zhang XC; Guo KJ; Zhao FC; Pang Y Hip Int; 2018 Jan; 28(1):101-105. PubMed ID: 29148019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery. Tuuli MG; Stout MJ; Martin S; Rampersad RM; Cahill AG; Macones GA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparing sutures versus staples for skin closure after orthopaedic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Krishnan R; MacNeil SD; Malvankar-Mehta MS BMJ Open; 2016 Jan; 6(1):e009257. PubMed ID: 26792213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery. Basha SL; Rochon ML; Quiñones JN; Coassolo KM; Rust OA; Smulian JC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):285.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20816153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Staples versus sutures for closing leg wounds after vein graft harvesting for coronary artery bypass surgery. Biancari F; Tiozzo V Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 May; (5):CD008057. PubMed ID: 20464762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Is the Risk of Infection Lower with Sutures than with Staples for Skin Closure After Orthopaedic Surgery? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Krishnan RJ; Crawford EJ; Syed I; Kim P; Rampersaud YR; Martin J Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 May; 477(5):922-937. PubMed ID: 30958392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial. Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques. Schrufer-Poland TL; Ruiz MP; Kassar S; Tomassian C; Algren SD; Yeast JD Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():53-56. PubMed ID: 27632411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis. Smith TO; Sexton D; Mann C; Donell S BMJ; 2010 Mar; 340():c1199. PubMed ID: 20234041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A randomized, prospective study of total hip wound closure with resorbable subcuticular staples. Fisher DA; Bengero LL; Clapp BC; Burgess M Orthopedics; 2010 Sep; 33(9):665. PubMed ID: 20839703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Advantages of skin closure with subcuticular suture for liver resection on postoperative and cosmetic outcomes: a propensity matched analysis. Kawaguchi C; Hokuto D; Yasuda S; Yoshikawa T; Kamitani N; Matsuo Y; Sho M Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 May; 407(3):1121-1129. PubMed ID: 34988640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prevention of Incisional Surgical Site Infection Using a Subcuticular Absorbable Suture in Elective Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer. Bou H; Suzuki H; Maejima K; Uchida E; Tokunaga A Int Surg; 2015 Jun; 100(6):999-1003. PubMed ID: 26414820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A combination of subcuticular sutures and a drain for skin closure reduces wound complications in obese women undergoing surgery using vertical incisions. Inotsume-Kojima Y; Uchida T; Abe M; Doi T; Kanayama N J Hosp Infect; 2011 Feb; 77(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 20971528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Wound morbidity with staples compared with suture for cesarean skin closure by diabetic status. Fitzwater JL; Jauk VC; Figueroa D; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Tita AT J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 25567558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Efficacy of skin closure with subcuticular sutures for preventing wound infection after resection of colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. Yamaoka Y; Ikeda M; Ikenaga M; Haraguchi N; Miyake M; Yamamoto K; Asaoka T; Nishikawa K; Miyamoto A; Miyazaki M; Hirao M; Nakamori S; Sekimoto M Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2015 Dec; 400(8):961-6. PubMed ID: 26432091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial. Rodel RL; Gray KM; Quiner TE; Bodea Braescu A; Gerkin R; Perlow JH Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure? Cooper SM; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Tita ATN Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul; 36(9):981-984. PubMed ID: 30477032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of incision closures with subcuticular and percutaneous staples. Dresner HS; Hilger PA Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2009; 11(5):320-6. PubMed ID: 19797094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]