172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24075360)
1. A fusion-based approach for uterine cervical cancer histology image classification.
De S; Stanley RJ; Lu C; Long R; Antani S; Thoma G; Zuna R
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2013; 37(7-8):475-87. PubMed ID: 24075360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nuclei-Based Features for Uterine Cervical Cancer Histology Image Analysis With Fusion-Based Classification.
Guo P; Banerjee K; Joe Stanley R; Long R; Antani S; Thoma G; Zuna R; Frazier SR; Moss RH; Stoecker WV
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2016 Nov; 20(6):1595-1607. PubMed ID: 26529792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhancements in localized classification for uterine cervical cancer digital histology image assessment.
Guo P; Almubarak H; Banerjee K; Stanley RJ; Long R; Antani S; Thoma G; Zuna R; Frazier SR; Moss RH; Stoecker WV
J Pathol Inform; 2016; 7():51. PubMed ID: 28163974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hyperspectral wide gap second derivative analysis for in vivo detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Zheng W; Wang C; Chang S; Zhang S; Xu RX
J Biomed Opt; 2015 Dec; 20(12):121303. PubMed ID: 26220210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DeepCIN: Attention-Based Cervical histology Image Classification with Sequential Feature Modeling for Pathologist-Level Accuracy.
Sornapudi S; Stanley RJ; Stoecker WV; Long R; Xue Z; Zuna R; Frazier SR; Antani S
J Pathol Inform; 2020; 11():40. PubMed ID: 33828898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An automated machine vision system for the histological grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).
Keenan SJ; Diamond J; McCluggage WG; Bharucha H; Thompson D; Bartels PH; Hamilton PW
J Pathol; 2000 Nov; 192(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 11054719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias].
Rosamilia C; Feichter G; Tzankov A; Obermann EC
Pathologe; 2012 Mar; 33(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 22350168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical study of quantitative diagnosis of early cervical cancer based on the classification of acetowhitening kinetics.
Wu T; Cheung TH; Yim SF; Qu JY
J Biomed Opt; 2010; 15(2):026001. PubMed ID: 20459246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Integrated Approach to Automated Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Digital Histology Images.
Brosnan B; Skarga-Bandurova I; Biloborodova T; Skarha-Bandurov I
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2023 May; 302():615-616. PubMed ID: 37203763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sources of scattering in cervical tissue: determination of the scattering coefficient by confocal microscopy.
Collier T; Follen M; Malpica A; Richards-Kortum R
Appl Opt; 2005 Apr; 44(11):2072-81. PubMed ID: 15835356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Gallwas JK; Turk L; Stepp H; Mueller S; Ochsenkuehn R; Friese K; Dannecker C
Lasers Surg Med; 2011 Mar; 43(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 21412804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated image analysis of digital colposcopy for the detection of cervical neoplasia.
Park SY; Follen M; Milbourne A; Rhodes H; Malpica A; MacKinnon N; MacAulay C; Markey MK; Richards-Kortum R
J Biomed Opt; 2008; 13(1):014029. PubMed ID: 18315387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. BAG3 expression correlates with the grade of dysplasia in squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix.
Raffone A; Travaglino A; D'Antonio A; De Marco M; Caccese M; Mascolo M; Insabato L; Zeppa P; Rosati A; Mollo A; Zullo F; Guida M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Jan; 99(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 31444794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic efficacy of computer extracted image features in optical coherence tomography of the precancerous cervix.
Kang W; Qi X; Tresser NJ; Kareta M; Belinson JL; Rollins AM
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 21361180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual staining for p16/Ki-67 to detect high-grade cervical lesions: Results from the Screening Triage Ascertaining Intraepithelial Neoplasia by Immunostain Testing study.
El-Zein M; Gotlieb W; Gilbert L; Hemmings R; Behr MA; Franco EL;
Int J Cancer; 2021 Jan; 148(2):492-501. PubMed ID: 32781481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization.
Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relationship between syntactic structure analysis features, histological grade and high-risk HPV DNA in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Kruse AJ; Buhr-Wildhagen S; Janssen EA; Baak JP
Cell Oncol; 2004; 26(3):135-41. PubMed ID: 15371649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Domain-specific image analysis for cervical neoplasia detection based on conditional random fields.
Park SY; Sargent D; Lieberman R; Gustafsson U
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Mar; 30(3):867-78. PubMed ID: 21245006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated classification of brain tumor type in whole-slide digital pathology images using local representative tiles.
Barker J; Hoogi A; Depeursinge A; Rubin DL
Med Image Anal; 2016 May; 30():60-71. PubMed ID: 26854941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional reconstruction and quantification of cervical carcinoma invasion fronts from histological serial sections.
Braumann UD; Kuska JP; Einenkel J; Horn LC; Löffler M; Höckel M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1286-307. PubMed ID: 16229416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
