These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24075425)

  • 1. Evaluating the accuracy of the visual field index for the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in patients with mild to moderate glaucoma.
    Talbot R; Goldberg I; Kelly P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 156(6):1272-6. PubMed ID: 24075425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of the visual field index in glaucoma patients with moderately advanced visual field loss.
    Lee JM; Cirineo N; Ramanathan M; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Morales E; Coleman AL; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 157(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 24200229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new index to monitor central visual field progression in glaucoma.
    de Moraes CG; Furlanetto RL; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1531-8. PubMed ID: 24726202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma.
    Rao HL; Yadav RK; Begum VU; Addepalli UK; Choudhari NS; Senthil S; Garudadri CS
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 25256758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of glaucomatous visual field loss by extrapolation of linear trends.
    Bengtsson B; Patella VM; Heijl A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 127(12):1610-5. PubMed ID: 20008716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of simultaneous visual field testing.
    Kramer BC; Musch DC; Niziol LM; Weizer JS
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Feb; 119(2):304-7. PubMed ID: 22115714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The region of largest β-zone parapapillary atrophy area predicts the location of most rapid visual field progression.
    Teng CC; De Moraes CG; Prata TS; Liebmann CA; Tello C; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Dec; 118(12):2409-13. PubMed ID: 21885127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between severity of visual field loss at presentation and rate of visual field progression in glaucoma.
    Rao HL; Kumar AU; Babu JG; Senthil S; Garudadri CS
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Feb; 118(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 20728941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk factors for visual field progression in the groningen longitudinal glaucoma study: a comparison of different statistical approaches.
    Wesselink C; Marcus MW; Jansonius NM
    J Glaucoma; 2012 Dec; 21(9):579-85. PubMed ID: 21701396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applying "Lasso" Regression to Predict Future Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma Patients.
    Fujino Y; Murata H; Mayama C; Asaoka R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 56(4):2334-9. PubMed ID: 25698708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optic disc progression and rates of visual field change in treated glaucoma.
    De Moraes CG; Liebmann JM; Park SC; Teng CC; Nemiroff J; Tello C; Ritch R
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 91(2):e86-91. PubMed ID: 23356423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of false-negative responses for full threshold and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal observers.
    Johnson CA; Sherman K; Doyle C; Wall M
    J Glaucoma; 2014; 23(5):288-92. PubMed ID: 23632399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence-based Criteria for Assessment of Visual Field Reliability.
    Yohannan J; Wang J; Brown J; Chauhan BC; Boland MV; Friedman DS; Ramulu PY
    Ophthalmology; 2017 Nov; 124(11):1612-1620. PubMed ID: 28676280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors that influence standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma: test reliability, technician experience, time of day, and season.
    Junoy Montolio FG; Wesselink C; Gordijn M; Jansonius NM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7010-7. PubMed ID: 22952121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss.
    Crabb DP; Smith ND; Glen FC; Burton R; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Jun; 120(6):1120-6. PubMed ID: 23415421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parafoveal scotoma progression in glaucoma: humphrey 10-2 versus 24-2 visual field analysis.
    Park SC; Kung Y; Su D; Simonson JL; Furlanetto RL; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug; 120(8):1546-50. PubMed ID: 23697959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Behavior of visual field index in advanced glaucoma.
    Rao HL; Senthil S; Choudhari NS; Mandal AK; Garudadri CS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):307-12. PubMed ID: 23233259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation in the detection of glaucoma with localized visual field defects.
    Kook MS; Cho HS; Seong M; Choi J
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1970-8. PubMed ID: 16185765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Properties of the statpac visual field index.
    Artes PH; O'Leary N; Hutchison DM; Heckler L; Sharpe GP; Nicolela MT; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 52(7):4030-8. PubMed ID: 21467169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.