These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24075425)
21. Peripapillary choroidal thickness in both eyes of glaucoma patients with unilateral visual field loss. Li L; Bian A; Zhou Q; Mao J Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 156(6):1277-1284.e1. PubMed ID: 24011520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Factors affecting rates of visual field progression in glaucoma patients with optic disc hemorrhage. Prata TS; De Moraes CG; Teng CC; Tello C; Ritch R; Liebmann JM Ophthalmology; 2010 Jan; 117(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 19896197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Visual field index rate and event-based glaucoma progression analysis: comparison in a glaucoma population. Casas-Llera P; Rebolleda G; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Arnalich-Montiel F; Pérez-López M; Fernández-Buenaga R Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 93(12):1576-9. PubMed ID: 19535357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm. Newkirk MR; Gardiner SK; Demirel S; Johnson CA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4632-7. PubMed ID: 17003461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Correlation between visual field index values and mean deviation values of Humphrey field analyzer]. Kimura S; Kimura T; Ono K; Murakami A Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2011 Aug; 115(8):686-92. PubMed ID: 21882585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Global and pointwise rates of decay in glaucoma eyes deteriorating according to pointwise event analysis. Nassiri N; Moghimi S; Coleman AL; Law SK; Caprioli J; Nouri-Mahdavi K Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 54(2):1208-13. PubMed ID: 23329667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Association of reliability with reproducibility of the glaucomatous visual field. McMillan TA; Stewart WC; Hunt HH Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1992 Oct; 70(5):665-70. PubMed ID: 1471493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients. Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Association Between Visual Field Reliability Indices and Cognitive Impairment in Glaucoma Patients. Raman P; Khy Ching Y; Sivagurunathan PD; Ramli N; Mohd Khalid KH J Glaucoma; 2019 Aug; 28(8):685-690. PubMed ID: 31033782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Do pattern deviation values accurately estimate glaucomatous visual field damage in eyes with glaucoma and cataract? Matsuda A; Hara T; Miyata K; Matsuo H; Murata H; Mayama C; Asaoka R Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 99(9):1240-4. PubMed ID: 25795915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma. Hawkins AS; Szlyk JP; Ardickas Z; Alexander KR; Wilensky JT J Glaucoma; 2003 Apr; 12(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 12671468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Analysis of a new visual field index, the VFI, in Ocular Hypertension and Glaucoma]. Giraud JM; Fenolland JR; May F; Hammam O; Sadat AM; Boumezrag AB; Renard JP J Fr Ophtalmol; 2010 Jan; 33(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 20005005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Measurement precision in a series of visual fields acquired by the standard and fast versions of the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm: analysis of large-scale data from clinics. Saunders LJ; Russell RA; Crabb DP JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 25340390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices. Asaoka R; Crabb DP; Yamashita T; Russell RA; Wang YX; Garway-Heath DF Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(9):7007-11. PubMed ID: 21810985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Five-year forecasts of the Visual Field Index (VFI) with binocular and monocular visual fields. Asaoka R; Russell RA; Malik R; Garway-Heath DF; Crabb DP Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 May; 251(5):1335-41. PubMed ID: 23224148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Scanning laser polarimetry of the retinal nerve fiber layer in perimetrically unaffected eyes of glaucoma patients. Reus NJ; Lemij HG Ophthalmology; 2004 Dec; 111(12):2199-203. PubMed ID: 15582074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Disease severity in newly diagnosed glaucoma patients with visual field loss: trends from more than a decade of data. Boodhna T; Crabb DP Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Mar; 35(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 25545852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predictive value of confocal scanning laser for the onset of visual field loss in glaucoma suspects. Larrosa JM; Polo V; Ferreras A; Gil L; Fuertes I; Pablo LE Ophthalmology; 2012 Aug; 119(8):1558-62. PubMed ID: 22584019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. How Many Visual Fields Are Required to Precisely Predict Future Test Results in Glaucoma Patients When Using Different Trend Analyses? Taketani Y; Murata H; Fujino Y; Mayama C; Asaoka R Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jun; 56(6):4076-82. PubMed ID: 26114484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of a Novel Visual Field Analyzer Application for Automated Classification of Glaucoma Severity. Germano RAS; de Moraes CG; Susanna R; Dantas DO; Neto EDS J Glaucoma; 2017 Jun; 26(6):586-591. PubMed ID: 28368999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]