154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24075599)
1. A comparison of cervical histopathology variability using whole slide digitized images versus glass slides: experience with a statewide registry.
Gage JC; Joste N; Ronnett BM; Stoler M; Hunt WC; Schiffman M; Wheeler CM
Hum Pathol; 2013 Nov; 44(11):2542-8. PubMed ID: 24075599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital slide imaging in cervicovaginal cytology: a pilot study.
Wright AM; Smith D; Dhurandhar B; Fairley T; Scheiber-Pacht M; Chakraborty S; Gorman BK; Mody D; Coffey DM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 May; 137(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 22970841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Kappa statistics to measure interrater and intrarater agreement for 1790 cervical biopsy specimens among twelve pathologists: qualitative histopathologic analysis and methodologic issues.
Malpica A; Matisic JP; Niekirk DV; Crum CP; Staerkel GA; Yamal JM; Guillaud MH; Cox DD; Atkinson EN; Adler-Storthz K; Poulin NM; Macaulay CA; Follen M
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3 Suppl 1):S38-52. PubMed ID: 16183106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility of telecytology diagnosis of cervical smears in a quality assurance program: the Georgian experience.
Kldiashvili E; Schrader T
Telemed J E Health; 2011 Sep; 17(7):565-8. PubMed ID: 21851161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Whole slide imaging equivalency and efficiency study: experience at a large academic center.
Hanna MG; Reuter VE; Hameed MR; Tan LK; Chiang S; Sigel C; Hollmann T; Giri D; Samboy J; Moradel C; Rosado A; Otilano JR; England C; Corsale L; Stamelos E; Yagi Y; Schüffler PJ; Fuchs T; Klimstra DS; Sirintrapun SJ
Mod Pathol; 2019 Jul; 32(7):916-928. PubMed ID: 30778169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic and Treatment Reproducibility of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia / Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Factors Affecting the Diagnosis.
Sağlam A; Usubütün A; Dolgun A; Mutter GL; Salman MC; Kurtulan O; Akyol A; Özkan EA; Baykara S; Bülbül D; Calay Z; Eren F; Gümürdülü D; Haberal N; Ilvan Ş; Karaveli Ş; Koyuncuoğlu M; Müezzinoğlu B; Müftüoğlu KH; Özen Ö; Özdemir N; Peştereli E; Ulukuş Ç; Zekioğlu O
Turk Patoloji Derg; 2017; 1(1):177-191. PubMed ID: 28832077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Whole-Slide Imaging of Pap Cellblock Preparations Is a Potentially Valid Screening Method.
Tawfik O; Davis M; Dillon S; Tawfik L; Diaz FJ; Amin K; Fan F
Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 25967603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study.
Stoler MH; Schiffman M;
JAMA; 2001 Mar; 285(11):1500-5. PubMed ID: 11255427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Altered recognition of reparative changes in ThinPrep specimens in the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytology Program.
Snyder TM; Renshaw AA; Styer PE; Mody DR; Colgan TJ;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Jul; 129(7):861-5. PubMed ID: 15974808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. iPathology cockpit diagnostic station: validation according to College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center recommendation at the Hospital Trust and University of Verona.
Brunelli M; Beccari S; Colombari R; Gobbo S; Giobelli L; Pellegrini A; Chilosi M; Lunardi M; Martignoni G; Scarpa A; Eccher A
Diagn Pathol; 2014; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 25565219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of glass slides and various digital-slide modalities for cytopathology screening and interpretation.
Hanna MG; Monaco SE; Cuda J; Xing J; Ahmed I; Pantanowitz L
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Sep; 125(9):701-709. PubMed ID: 28558124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].
Della Palma P; Moresco L; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43. PubMed ID: 23139174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Artificial intelligence-assisted cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or invasive cancer: A multicenter, clinical-based, observational study.
Bao H; Bi H; Zhang X; Zhao Y; Dong Y; Luo X; Zhou D; You Z; Wu Y; Liu Z; Zhang Y; Liu J; Fang L; Wang L
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):171-178. PubMed ID: 32814641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Team Reading (Peer Review) of Suspicious/Positive Slides for Continuous Quality Improvement in Cervical-Vaginal Cytology: A Comparison between Methods and Indicators.
Placidi A; Capparucci P; Di Luzio A; Manca G; Mania E; Filippini T; Giorgi Rossi P
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(5):458-464. PubMed ID: 27504992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy.
Bergeron C; Bishop J; Lemarie A; Cas F; Ayivi J; Huynh B; Barrasso R
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11480712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Review of the Bethesda System atlas does not improve reproducibility or accuracy in the classification of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance smears.
Smith AE; Sherman ME; Scott DR; Tabbara SO; Dworkin L; Olson J; Thompson J; Faser C; Snell J; Schiffman M
Cancer; 2000 Aug; 90(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 10966559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.
Lee JS; Kuan L; Oh S; Patten FW; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9479344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel automated screening and interpretation process for cervical cytology using the internet transmission of low-resolution images: a feasibility study.
Eichhorn JH; Brauns TA; Gelfand JA; Crothers BA; Wilbur DC
Cancer; 2005 Aug; 105(4):199-206. PubMed ID: 15937917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of reading liquid based cytology slides using the ThinPrep Imager compared with conventional cytology: prospective study.
Davey E; d'Assuncao J; Irwig L; Macaskill P; Chan SF; Richards A; Farnsworth A
BMJ; 2007 Jul; 335(7609):31. PubMed ID: 17604301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Split-sample analysis of discarded cells from liquid-based Pap smear sampling devices.
Rinas AC; Mittman BW; Le LV; Hartmann K; Cayless J; Singh HK
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 16514841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
