These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24075671)

  • 1. Assessment of the accuracy and reliability of new 3-dimensional scanning devices.
    Hayashi K; Sachdeva AU; Saitoh S; Lee SP; Kubota T; Mizoguchi I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Oct; 144(4):619-25. PubMed ID: 24075671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements.
    Sousa MV; Vasconcelos EC; Janson G; Garib D; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 22858338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of standardization on the precision (reproducibility) of dental cast analysis with virtual 3-dimensional models.
    Hayashi K; Chung O; Park S; Lee SP; Sachdeva RC; Mizoguchi I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):373-80. PubMed ID: 25726405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis.
    Akyalcin S; Dyer DJ; English JD; Sar C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):831-7. PubMed ID: 24286906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
    Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy.
    Keating AP; Knox J; Bibb R; Zhurov AI
    J Orthod; 2008 Sep; 35(3):191-201; discussion 175. PubMed ID: 18809782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
    Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Registration using three-dimensional laser surface scanning for navigation in oral and craniomaxillofacial surgery].
    Troitzsch D; Hoffmann J; Dammann F; Bartz D; Reinert S
    Zentralbl Chir; 2003 Jul; 128(7):551-6. PubMed ID: 12884140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
    Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies.
    Grünheid T; Patel N; De Felippe NL; Wey A; Gaillard PR; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 24485729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of a 3D laser scanner using superimpositional software to assess the accuracy of impression techniques.
    Shah S; Sundaram G; Bartlett D; Sherriff M
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):653-8. PubMed ID: 15476960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the augmented reproducibility in measurements on 3D orthodontic digital dental models and the definition of feature points.
    Jacquet W; Nyssen E; Ibel G; Vannet BV
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 23785935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digitizing implant position locators on master casts: comparison of a noncontact scanner and a contact-probe scanner.
    Holst S; Persson A; Wichmann M; Karl M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 22299075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The research and development of noncontact 3-D laser dental model measuring and analyzing system.
    Lu P; Li Z; Wang Y; Chen J; Zhao J
    Chin J Dent Res; 2000 Nov; 3(3):7-14. PubMed ID: 11314539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner.
    Persson A; Andersson M; Oden A; Sandborgh-Englund G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 16543016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Registration accuracy in the integration of laser-scanned dental images into maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Noh H; Nabha W; Cho JH; Hwang HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):585-91. PubMed ID: 21967948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of measuring facial morphology with a 3-dimensional laser scanning system.
    Kau CH; Richmond S; Zhurov AI; Knox J; Chestnutt I; Hartles F; Playle R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):424-30. PubMed ID: 16214622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A proposal for soft tissue landmarks for craniofacial analysis using 3-dimensional laser scan imaging.
    Baik HS; Lee HJ; Lee KJ
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 16548301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital dental cast placement in 3-dimensional, full-face reconstruction: a technical evaluation.
    Rosati R; De Menezes M; Rossetti A; Sforza C; Ferrario VF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 20620838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.