BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24076376)

  • 1. Spatial attention: differential shifts in pseudoneglect direction with time-on-task and initial bias support the idea of observer subtypes.
    Benwell CS; Thut G; Learmonth G; Harvey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2747-56. PubMed ID: 24076376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential shift in spatial bias over time depends on observers׳ initial bias: Observer subtypes, or regression to the mean?
    Newman DP; Loughnane GM; Abe R; Zoratti MT; Martins AC; van den Bogert PC; Kelly SP; O'Connell RG; Bellgrove MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Nov; 64():33-40. PubMed ID: 25234646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G
    Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.
    Toba MN; Cavanagh P; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rightward shift in spatial awareness with declining alertness.
    Manly T; Dobler VB; Dodds CM; George MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(12):1721-8. PubMed ID: 16154447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time-on-task effect in pseudoneglect.
    Dufour A; Touzalin P; Candas V
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(3):532-7. PubMed ID: 17146643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
    Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
    Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
    Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Thut G
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86(100):370-80. PubMed ID: 24128738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linking time-on-task, spatial bias and hemispheric activation asymmetry: a neural correlate of rightward attention drift.
    Newman DP; O'Connell RG; Bellgrove MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1215-23. PubMed ID: 23583973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective modulations of attentional asymmetries after sleep deprivation.
    Schmitz R; Deliens G; Mary A; Urbain C; Peigneux P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3351-60. PubMed ID: 21871469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finding centre: ocular and fMRI investigations of bisection and landmark task performance.
    Cavézian C; Valadao D; Hurwitz M; Saoud M; Danckert J
    Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 1437():89-103. PubMed ID: 22230669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lower-right and upper-left biases within upper and lower visual fields in a circular array task.
    Szelest I; Elias LJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Dec; 119(3):861-79. PubMed ID: 25375827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The centre is not in the middle: evidence from line and word bisection.
    Arduino LS; Previtali P; Girelli L
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2140-6. PubMed ID: 20385154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 21227410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Horizontal and vertical pseudoneglect in peri- and extrapersonal space.
    Heber IA; Siebertz S; Wolter M; Kuhlen T; Fimm B
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 20537456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-related reduction of hemispheric lateralisation for spatial attention: An EEG study.
    Learmonth G; Benwell CSY; Thut G; Harvey M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jun; 153():139-151. PubMed ID: 28343987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial attention and the mental number line: evidence for characteristic biases and compression.
    Longo MR; Lourenco SF
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1400-7. PubMed ID: 17157335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional bias as trait: correlations with novelty seeking.
    Tomer R
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2064-70. PubMed ID: 18342343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Paradoxical cross-over due to attention to high or low spatial frequencies.
    Niemeier M; Stojanoski B; Singh VW; Chu E
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jun; 67(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 18243459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.