These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24076674)

  • 1. Discussion: Three-dimensional simulated images in breast augmentation surgery: an investigation of patients' satisfaction and the correlation between prediction and actual outcome.
    Hammond DC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Oct; 132(4):823-825. PubMed ID: 24076674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional simulated images in breast augmentation surgery: an investigation of patients' satisfaction and the correlation between prediction and actual outcome.
    Swanson E
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Apr; 133(4):595e-597e. PubMed ID: 24675214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional simulated images in breast augmentation surgery: an investigation of patients' satisfaction and the correlation between prediction and actual outcome.
    Donfrancesco A; Montemurro P; Hedén P
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Oct; 132(4):810-822. PubMed ID: 24076673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.
    Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Augmentation mammaplasty: asymmetrical lowering of breast fold.
    Pacik PT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Jun; 117(7):2523-4. PubMed ID: 16772987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions.
    Tepper OM; Small KH; Unger JG; Feldman DL; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp NS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 19387164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correction of breast asymmetries with implants.
    Zayakova Y
    Khirurgiia (Sofiia); 2013; (1):12-7. PubMed ID: 23847805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discussion: Anatomical and Round Implants: How to Select and Indications for Use.
    Hidalgo DA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Aug; 136(2):273-275. PubMed ID: 26218377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The limitations of three-dimensional simulations in breast augmentation.
    Swanson E
    Aesthet Surg J; 2015 Mar; 35(3):NP62-4. PubMed ID: 25805290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anatomical and Round Breast Implants: How to Select and Indications for Use.
    Hedén P; Montemurro P; Adams WP; Germann G; Scheflan M; Maxwell GP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Aug; 136(2):263-272. PubMed ID: 26218376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comments on "Three-Dimensional Imaging for Breast Augmentation: Is this Technology Providing Accurate Simulations?".
    Hall-Findlay E
    Aesthet Surg J; 2015 Mar; 35(3):NP68-72. PubMed ID: 25805292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Secondary augmentation-mastopexy: indications, preferred practices, and the treatment of complications.
    Spring MA; Macias LH; Nadeau M; Stevens WG
    Aesthet Surg J; 2014 Sep; 34(7):1018-40. PubMed ID: 25168806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical Approaches to Breast Augmentation: The Transaxillary Approach.
    Strock LL
    Clin Plast Surg; 2015 Oct; 42(4):585-93. PubMed ID: 26408445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Commentary to 'primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type'.
    Farhadieh RD
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1173. PubMed ID: 23660279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. One-stage augmentation-mastopexy with Wise pattern and inverted-T scar.
    Barutcu A; Baytekin C
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Sep; 33(5):784-5. PubMed ID: 19543940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-Dimensional Imaging for Breast Augmentation: Is This Technology Providing Accurate Simulations?
    Roostaeian J; Adams WP
    Aesthet Surg J; 2014 Aug; 34(6):857-75. PubMed ID: 24970274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Commentary on: evaluation of the effects of silicone implants on the breast parenchyma.
    Hall-Findlay E
    Aesthet Surg J; 2015 Nov; 35(8):936-7. PubMed ID: 26508646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast augmentation.
    Spear SL; Bulan EJ; Venturi ML
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):73E-81E. PubMed ID: 15457008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Round gel breast implants or anatomic gel breast implants: which is the best choice?
    Cárdenas-Camarena L; Encinas-Brambila J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Sep; 33(5):743-51. PubMed ID: 19484175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correction of small volume breast asymmetry using deep parenchymal resection and identical silicone implants: an early experience.
    Somogyi RB; Stavrou D; Southwick G
    Aesthet Surg J; 2015 May; 35(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 25908698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.