These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2407824)

  • 1. An effect of tray design and material retention on the linear dimensional changes in polysulfide impressions.
    Walters RA; Spurrier S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Mar; 63(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 2407824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of tray adhesives for the adhesion of elastomer rubber impression materials to impression modeling plastics for border molding.
    Nishigawa G; Sato T; Suenaga K; Minagi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 9513098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The bond strength of elastomer tray adhesives to thermoplastic and acrylic resin tray materials.
    Hogans WR; Agar JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Apr; 67(4):541-3. PubMed ID: 1507140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adhesion between copper-plated acrylic tray resin and a polysulfide rubber impression material.
    Shigeto N; Kawazoe Y; Hamada T; Yamada S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Aug; 42(2):228-30. PubMed ID: 379322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Gordon GE; Johnson GH; Drennon DG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making a custom tray for elastomeric impression materials without a primary cast.
    Ansari IH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Nov; 72(5):569-71. PubMed ID: 7844762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part II.
    Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 1800721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of stone casts obtained by different impression materials.
    Faria AC; Rodrigues RC; Macedo AP; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 19148382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing effects of tray treatment on the accuracy of dies.
    Tjan AH; Whang SB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Aug; 58(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 3305883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of elastomeric impression materials used in fixed prosthodontics.
    Ciesco JN; Malone WF; Sandrik JL; Mazur B
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Jan; 45(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7007629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ability of various impression materials to produce duplicate dies from successive impressions.
    Morgano SM; Milot P; Ducharme P; Rose L
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 7783010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of impression-die systems on crown margins.
    Plekavich EJ; Joncas JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Jun; 49(6):772-6. PubMed ID: 6348258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of tray space on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
    Tjan AH; Nemetz H; Nguyen LT; Contino R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul; 68(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 1403906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A complete denture impression technique survey of postdoctoral prosthodontic programs in the United States.
    Mehra M; Vahidi F; Berg RW
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 24118134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a rubber-base impression material.
    Gunther G; Welsh SI
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Jan; 39(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 340664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impression material thickness in stock and custom trays.
    Bomberg TJ; Hatch RA; Hoffman W
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Aug; 54(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 3903109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Utility of the impression technique with the individual tray for cast crown].
    Kohno S; Kamaguchi K; Matsushita K; Kato H; Tabata T
    Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jun; 33(3):558-70. PubMed ID: 2489715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Issues in handling impression materials.
    Giordano R
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12004656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.