960 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24079878)
1. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in patients <65 years old.
Kaneko T; Aranki S; Javed Q; McGurk S; Shekar P; Davidson M; Cohn L
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 24079878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Very late outcomes for mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 25-year follow-up of 450 implantations.
Bourguignon T; Bouquiaux-Stablo AL; Loardi C; Mirza A; Candolfi P; Marchand M; Aupart MR
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):2004-2011.e1. PubMed ID: 24667021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis.
McClure RS; McGurk S; Cevasco M; Maloney A; Gosev I; Wiegerinck EM; Salvio G; Tokmaji G; Borstlap W; Nauta F; Cohn LH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1931-9. PubMed ID: 24521965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival and outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical mitral valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
Chikwe J; Chiang YP; Egorova NN; Itagaki S; Adams DH
JAMA; 2015 Apr; 313(14):1435-42. PubMed ID: 25871669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?
Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postoperative warfarin following mitral valve repair or bioprosthetic valve replacement.
Thourani VH; Gunter RL; Hurst S; Kilgo P; Padala M; Puskas JD; Lattouf OM; Halkos ME; Guyton RA
J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 Sep; 22(5):716-23. PubMed ID: 24383387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical or biologic prostheses for mitral valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yu J; Qiao E; Wang W
Clin Cardiol; 2022 Jul; 45(7):701-716. PubMed ID: 35665516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term follow up of patients undergoing reoperative surgery with aortic or mitral valve replacement using a St. Jude Medical prosthesis.
Emery RW; Krogh CC; McAdams S; Emery AM; Holter AR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Jul; 19(4):473-84. PubMed ID: 20845896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.
Wang Y; Chen S; Shi J; Li G; Dong N
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single center experience with the Sorin Bicarbon prosthesis: a 17-year clinical follow-up.
Celiento M; Filaferro L; Milano AD; Anastasio G; Ferrari G; Bortolotti U
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):2039-44. PubMed ID: 24332112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term outcomes of valve replacement with modern prostheses in young adults.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Bédard P; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 27(3):425-33; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 15740951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?
Tourmousoglou C; Rao V; Lalos S; Dougenis D
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 25754372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement with mechanical or biological substitutes: a 20 years cohort.
Ribeiro AH; Wender OC; de Almeida AS; Soares LE; Picon PD
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2014 Oct; 14():146. PubMed ID: 25326757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements.
Isaacs AJ; Shuhaiber J; Salemi A; Isom OW; Sedrakyan A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 May; 149(5):1262-9.e3. PubMed ID: 25791947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén PS
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: time-related outcomes and risk factors.
Alsoufi B; Al-Halees Z; Fadel B; Al-Wesabi A; Al-Ahmadi M; Joufan M; Siblini G; Canver CC
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May; 19(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 20583397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reoperative aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians-minimally invasive technique in the era of transcatheter valve replacement.
Kaneko T; Loberman D; Gosev I; Rassam F; McGurk S; Leacche M; Cohn L
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 24183906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
