These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24079927)

  • 21. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of several approaches for controlling measurement error in small samples.
    Savalei V
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Jun; 24(3):352-370. PubMed ID: 29781637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Power, effects, confidence, and significance: an investigation of statistical practices in nursing research.
    Gaskin CJ; Happell B
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2014 May; 51(5):795-806. PubMed ID: 24207028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accounting for measurement error: a critical but often overlooked process.
    Harris EF; Smith RN
    Arch Oral Biol; 2009 Dec; 54 Suppl 1():S107-17. PubMed ID: 18674753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accelerated failure time models with covariates subject to measurement error.
    He W; Yi GY; Xiong J
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(26):4817-32. PubMed ID: 17436310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Worse than measurement error: Consequences of inappropriate latent variable measurement models.
    Rhemtulla M; van Bork R; Borsboom D
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Feb; 25(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 31169371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Structural inference in transition measurement error models for longitudinal data.
    Pan W; Lin X; Zeng D
    Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):402-12. PubMed ID: 16918904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ratio estimation with measurement error in the auxiliary variate.
    Gregoire TG; Salas C
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):590-8. PubMed ID: 18759838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Regression modeling strategies].
    Núñez E; Steyerberg EW; Núñez J
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Jun; 64(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 21531065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.
    Chatburn RL
    AANA J; 1996 Jun; 64(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 9095698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Revisiting measurement models in psychosomatic medicine research: a latent variable approach.
    Llabre MM; Fitzpatrick SL
    Psychosom Med; 2012; 74(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 22286856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On the Fallibility of Principal Components in Research.
    Raykov T; Marcoulides GA; Li T
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Jan; 77(1):165-178. PubMed ID: 29795908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.
    Meredith W; Teresi JA
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. PubMed ID: 17060838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A clinically meaningful theory of outcome measures in rehabilitation medicine.
    Massof RW
    J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(3):253-70. PubMed ID: 20847474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reliability and validity of structural equation modeling applied to neuroimaging data: a simulation study.
    Boucard A; Marchand A; Noguès X
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Nov; 166(2):278-92. PubMed ID: 17825426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measuring effect sizes using manifest versus latent variables: consequences and implications for research.
    Leonhart R; Wirtz M; Bengel J
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2008 Sep; 31(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 18708843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reconsidering formative measurement.
    Howell RD; Breivik E; Wilcox JB
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):205-18. PubMed ID: 17563173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multiple-component radiation-measurement error models.
    Burr TL; Hemphill GS
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2006 Mar; 64(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 16297633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Measurement error in a random walk model with applications to population dynamics.
    Staudenmayer J; Buonaccorsi JP
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1178-89. PubMed ID: 17156293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What should be expected from feature selection in small-sample settings.
    Sima C; Dougherty ER
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2430-6. PubMed ID: 16870934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.