BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24081727)

  • 1. Three-dimensional evaluation of masseter muscle in different vertical facial patterns: a cross-sectional study in growing children.
    Lione R; Franchi L; Noviello A; Bollero P; Fanucci E; Cozza P
    Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Oct; 35(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 24081727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional computed tomographic assessment of mandibular muscles in growing subjects with different vertical facial patterns.
    Wong A; Woods MG; Stella D
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 27468586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of masseter muscle in different vertical skeletal patterns in growing patients.
    Biondi K; Lorusso P; Fastuca R; Mangano A; Zecca PA; Bosco M; Caprioglio A; Levrini L
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Mar; 17(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 26949239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Masticatory features, EMG activity and muscle effort of subjects with different facial patterns.
    Gomes SG; Custodio W; Faot F; Del Bel Cury AA; Garcia RC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Nov; 37(11):813-9. PubMed ID: 20726943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns.
    Rohila AK; Sharma VP; Shrivastav PK; Nagar A; Singh GP
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):726-31. PubMed ID: 23649053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of masseter muscles in relation to treatment with removable bite-blocks in dolichofacial growing subjects: A prospective controlled study.
    Lione R; Kiliaridis S; Noviello A; Franchi L; Antonarakis GS; Cozza P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1058-1064. PubMed ID: 28554451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of masseter muscle morphology in different types of malocclusions using cone beam computed tomography.
    Becht MP; Mah J; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 24456631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Masseter muscle thickness and mechanical advantage in relation to vertical craniofacial morphology in children.
    Charalampidou M; Kjellberg H; Georgiakaki I; Kiliaridis S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Feb; 66(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18320415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between masseter muscle thickness and maxillofacial morphology in pre-orthodontic treatment patients.
    Soyoye OA; Otuyemi OD; Kolawole KA; Ayoola OO
    Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):698-711. PubMed ID: 30348502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mastication, EMG activity and occlusal contact area in subjects with different facial types.
    Gomes SG; Custodio W; Jufer JS; Del Bel CA; Garcia RC
    Cranio; 2010 Oct; 28(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 21032982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative data on facial morphology and muscle thickness using ultrasonography.
    Satiroğlu F; Arun T; Işik F
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 16135538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Masseter muscle thickness in different skeletal morphology: an ultrasonographic study.
    Rani S; Ravi MS
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 20930353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Masseter muscle thickness in growing individuals and its relation to facial morphology.
    Raadsheer MC; Kiliaridis S; Van Eijden TM; Van Ginkel FC; Prahl-Andersen B
    Arch Oral Biol; 1996 Apr; 41(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 8771323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Mandibular First Molars' Axial Inclination and Alveolar Morphology in Different Facial Patterns: A CBCT Study.
    Ferreira MC; Freitas KMS; Herrera-Sanches FS; Santos PBD; Garib D; Janson G; Freitas MR
    Eur J Dent; 2020 Mar; 14(2):250-259. PubMed ID: 32438429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association of facial type with possible bruxism and its related clinical features in adolescents: A cross-sectional study.
    Souza GLN; Serra-Negra JM; Prado IM; Aguiar SO; Hoffmam GFEB; Pordeus IA; Auad SM; Abreu LG
    Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):758-769. PubMed ID: 32888883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between dimensions of muscles of mastication (masseter and lateral pterygoid) and skeletal dimensions: study of 40 cases.
    Azaroual MF; Fikri M; Abouqal R; Benyahya H; Zaoui F
    Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 24156908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Masseter thickness, endurance and exercise-induced pain in subjects with different vertical craniofacial morphology.
    Farella M; Bakke M; Michelotti A; Rapuano A; Martina R
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2003 Jun; 111(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 12786947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mandibular muscle morphology in children with different vertical facial patterns: A 3-dimensional computed tomography study.
    Chan HJ; Woods M; Stella D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):10.e1-13. PubMed ID: 18174063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Study on the association of ultrasonographic thickness and electromyographic activity of masseter muscle in young females with different vertical craniofacial morphology.
    Li HT; Cui CJ; Lu SL; He KY
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Oct; 17(5):529-34. PubMed ID: 18989598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationships between the size and spatial morphology of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles, the craniofacial skeleton, and jaw biomechanics.
    Hannam AG; Wood WW
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1989 Dec; 80(4):429-45. PubMed ID: 2603948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.