These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24081843)

  • 1. Spinous process fixation devices for instrumented spinal fusion.
    Hardenbrook M; Henn JS; Oppenheim J; Shah MV
    Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():273-82. PubMed ID: 24081843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do facet screws provide the required stability in lumbar fixation? A biomechanical comparison of the Boucher technique and pedicular fixation in primary and circumferential fusions.
    Agarwala A; Bucklen B; Muzumdar A; Moldavsky M; Khalil S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 21849224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of a novel percutaneous transfacet device and a traditional posterior system for single level fusion.
    Mahar A; Kim C; Oka R; Odell T; Perry A; Mirkovic S; Garfin S
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Dec; 19(8):591-4. PubMed ID: 17146303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using local facet joint autograft and pedicle screw fixation.
    Kai Y; Oyama M; Morooka M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jan; 29(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 14699274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of costotransverse process screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation of the upper thoracic spine.
    Little AS; Brasiliense LB; Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
    Neurosurgery; 2010 Mar; 66(3 Suppl Operative):178-82; discussion 182. PubMed ID: 20173568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization.
    Miyanji F; Mahar A; Oka R; Newton P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):E865-9. PubMed ID: 18978579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes and complications following spinous process fixation: a single-center analysis of 192 cases.
    Babu R; Gottfried ON; Stevenson JC
    Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():283-90. PubMed ID: 24081846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive transmuscular pedicle screw fixation of the thoracic and lumbar spine.
    Ringel F; Stoffel M; Stüer C; Meyer B
    Neurosurgery; 2006 Oct; 59(4 Suppl 2):ONS361-6; discussion ONS366-7. PubMed ID: 17041505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
    Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cranial facet joint violations by percutaneously placed pedicle screws adjacent to a minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion.
    Park Y; Ha JW; Lee YT; Sung NY
    Spine J; 2011 Apr; 11(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 21474080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical analysis of a novel posterior construct in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion model an in vitro study.
    Sethi A; Muzumdar AM; Ingalhalikar A; Vaidya R
    Spine J; 2011 Sep; 11(9):863-9. PubMed ID: 21802998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical analysis of sacral screw strain and range of motion in long posterior spinal fixation constructs: effects of lumbosacral fixation strategies in reducing sacral screw strains.
    Fleischer GD; Kim YJ; Ferrara LA; Freeman AL; Boachie-Adjei O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(3):E163-9. PubMed ID: 21857409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The biomechanical effect of pedicle screws' insertion angle and position on the superior adjacent segment in 1 segment lumbar fusion.
    Kim HJ; Chun HJ; Kang KT; Moon SH; Kim HS; Park JO; Moon ES; Kim BR; Sohn JS; Ko YN; Lee HM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(19):1637-44. PubMed ID: 22089393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screw implantation in spinous process for occipitoaxial fixation.
    Goel A; Kulkarni AG
    J Clin Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 11(7):735-7. PubMed ID: 15337136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spinal instrumentation in the management of degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.
    Sidhu KS; Herkowitz HN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Feb; (335):39-53. PubMed ID: 9020205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of translaminar facet screw fixation in circumferential interbody fusions as compared to pedicle screw fixation.
    Best NM; Sasso RC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Apr; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 16760782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical evaluation of a dynamic pedicle screw fixation device.
    Xu HZ; Wang XY; Chi YL; Zhu QA; Lin Y; Huang QS; Dai LY
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 16434133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adjacent instability after instrumented lumbar fusion.
    Chen WJ; Lai PL; Chen LH
    Chang Gung Med J; 2003 Nov; 26(11):792-8. PubMed ID: 14765748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stackable carbon fiber cages for thoracolumbar interbody fusion after corpectomy: long-term outcome analysis.
    Heary RF; Kheterpal A; Mammis A; Kumar S
    Neurosurgery; 2011 Mar; 68(3):810-8; discussion 818-9. PubMed ID: 21311306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Failure strength of lumbar spinous processes loaded in a tension band model.
    Golish SR; Fielding L; Agarwal V; Buckley J; Alamin TF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jul; 17(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 22559276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.