These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24082580)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of the antibacterial effects of four dentine bonding systems: An in vitro study.
    Arora R; Rao MH
    J Conserv Dent; 2013 Sep; 16(5):466-70. PubMed ID: 24082580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the antibacterial activity of different self-etching primers and adhesives.
    Korkmaz Y; Ozalp M; Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):57-64. PubMed ID: 18997917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antibacterial activities of MDPB and fluoride in dentin bonding agents.
    Ozer F; Unlü N; Karakaya S; Ergani O; Hadimli HH
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Sep; 13(3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16180641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of antibacterial properties of newer dentin bonding agents: An in vitro study.
    Sampath PB; Hegde MN; Hegde P
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2011 Jul; 2(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 22090758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antibacterial activity of different generation dentin-bonding systems.
    Başeren M; Yazici AR; Ozalp M; Dayangaç B
    Quintessence Int; 2005 May; 36(5):339-44. PubMed ID: 15892530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of human dentine on the antibacterial activity of self-etching adhesive systems against cariogenic bacteria.
    Gondim JO; Duque C; Hebling J; Giro EM
    J Dent; 2008 Apr; 36(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 18276056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Antibacterial effect of self-etching adhesive systems on Streptococcus mutans].
    Zhang L; Yuan CY; Tian FC; Wang XY; Gao XJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Feb; 48(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 26885909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: An ex vitro study.
    Amin S; Shetty HK; Varma RK; Amin V; Nair PM
    J Conserv Dent; 2014 May; 17(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 24944452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An invitro evaluation of antibacterial properties of self etching dental adhesive systems.
    Penmetsa RK; Rekha A S; Poppuri KC; Prashanth P S; Garapati S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Jul; 8(7):ZC01-5. PubMed ID: 25177626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Effect of Dental Luting Cements on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus: An In vitro Study.
    Feroz S; Bhoyar A; Khan S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):973-977. PubMed ID: 27965482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anti-bacterial efficacy of new self-etching dentine bonding agent.
    Brandt PD; de Wet FA; Botha SJ; de Wet BJ
    SADJ; 2004 Aug; 59(7):280, 282. PubMed ID: 15537028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of dentin on the antibacterial activity of dentin bonding agents.
    Schmalz G; Ergücü Z; Hiller KA
    J Endod; 2004 May; 30(5):352-8. PubMed ID: 15107649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Methacryloxydodecyl Pyridinium Bromide and Non-methacryloxydodecyl Pyridinium Bromide Dentin Bonding Systems Using Two Different Techniques: An In vitro Study.
    Deshpande P; Nainan MT; Metta KK; Shivanna V; Ravi R; Prashanth BR
    J Int Oral Health; 2014 Sep; 6(5):60-5. PubMed ID: 25395795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro antibacterial activity of adhesive systems on Streptococcus mutans.
    Paradella TC; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO
    J Adhes Dent; 2009 Apr; 11(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 19492710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro antibacterial activity of different self-etch adhesives.
    Poggio C; Arciola CR; Cepurnykh S; Chiesa M; Scribante A; Selan L; Imbriani M; Visai L
    Int J Artif Organs; 2012 Oct; 35(10):847-53. PubMed ID: 23080216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of antibacterial activity of three dentin primers using an in vitro tooth model.
    Ohmori K; Maeda N; Kohno A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(5):279-85. PubMed ID: 10823074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of antibacterial activity of two dentin bonding systems using agar well technique and tooth cavity model.
    Ozer F; Karakaya S; Unlü N; Erganiş O; Kav K; Imazato S
    J Dent; 2003 Feb; 31(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 12654550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Antimicrobial Effect of Orthodontic Materials on Cariogenic Bacteria Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus.
    Krasniqi S; Sejdini M; Stubljar D; Jukic T; Ihan A; Aliu K; Aliu X
    Med Sci Monit Basic Res; 2020 Jan; 26():e920510. PubMed ID: 31959737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antibacterial activity of various self-etching adhesive systems against oral streptococci.
    Esteves CM; Ota-Tsuzuki C; Reis AF; Rodrigues JA
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 20672730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Antimicrobial Properties of Acrylic Resin Incorporated with Propolis Nanoparticles.
    Arab S; Bahador A; Sodagar A; Pourhajibagher M; Akhavan A; Hafith AN; Pornamazeh T
    Front Dent; 2021; 18():29. PubMed ID: 35965714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.