147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24082741)
1. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of various retrograde filling materials: An in vitro study.
Galhotra V; Sofat A; Pandit IK; Gambhir RS; Srivastava N; Gugnani N
J Nat Sci Biol Med; 2013 Jul; 4(2):403-8. PubMed ID: 24082741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Root End Sealing Ability of Four Different Retrograde Filling Materials in Teeth with Root Apices Resected at Different Angles - An Invitro Study.
Jain A; Ponnappa KC; Yadav P; Rao Y; Relhan N; Gupta P; Choubey A; Bhardwaj S
J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Jan; 10(1):ZC14-7. PubMed ID: 26894168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage evaluation around retrograde filling materials prepared using conventional and ultrasonic techniques.
Mandava P; Bolla N; Thumu J; Vemuri S; Chukka S
J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Feb; 9(2):ZC43-6. PubMed ID: 25859524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spectrophotometric analysis evaluating apical microleakage in retrograde filling using GIC, MTA and biodentine: an in-vitro study.
Nepal M; Shubham S; Tripathi R; Khadka J; Kunwar D; Gautam V; Gautam N
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Feb; 20(1):37. PubMed ID: 32013975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sealing ability of amalgam, super EBA cement, and MTA when used as retrograde filling materials.
Aqrabawi J
Br Dent J; 2000 Mar; 188(5):266-8. PubMed ID: 10758689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative evaluation of sealing ability of four root end filling materials using fluid filtration method: An
Shetty S; Hiremath G; Yeli M
J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(5):307-310. PubMed ID: 29386776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of sealing capabilities of amalgum, GIC and zinc oxide eugenol cement when used as retro grade filling materials (in vitro study).
Ansari SR; Qayyum Z; Khitab U
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2003; 15(3):43-6. PubMed ID: 14727340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of internal matrices of hydroxyapatite and calcium sulfate on the sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and light cured glass ionomer cement.
Taneja S; Kumari M
J Conserv Dent; 2011 Jan; 14(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 21691497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sealing ability of castor oil polymer as a root-end filling material.
de Martins GR; Carvalho CA; Valera MC; de Oliveira LD; Buso L; Carvalho AS
J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 19466255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of glass ionomer-resin continuum as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study.
Chohan H; Dewan H; Annapoorna BM; Manjunath MK
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2015; 5(6):488-93. PubMed ID: 26759803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sealing ability of MTA, Super EBA, Vitremer and amalgam as root-end filling materials.
Pereira CL; Cenci MS; Demarco FF
Braz Oral Res; 2004; 18(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 16089263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative microleakage evaluation of three different base materials in Class I cavity in deciduous molars in sandwich technique using dye penetration and dentin surface interface by scanning electron microscope.
Niranjan B; Shashikiran ND; Singla S; Thakur R; Dubey A; Maran S
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 27681395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sealing Ability of Nano-fast Cement
Moazzami F; Ghorbani Jahandizi N; Shokouhi MM; Ghahramani Y
Iran Endod J; 2023; 18(4):206-210. PubMed ID: 37829831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the sealing capabilities of Ketac-silver and extra high copper alloy amalgam when used as retrograde root canal filling.
al-Ajam AD; McGregor AJ
J Endod; 1993 Jul; 19(7):353-6. PubMed ID: 8245758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the Effect of Resection on the Sealing Ability of MTA and CEM Cement.
Milani AS; Shakouie S; Borna Z; Sighari Deljavan A; Asghari Jafarabadi M; Pournaghi Azar F
Iran Endod J; 2012; 7(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 23056132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement used as root-end filling materials.
Shahi S; Yavari HR; Rahimi S; Eskandarinezhad M; Shakouei S; Unchi M
J Oral Sci; 2011 Dec; 53(4):517-22. PubMed ID: 22167039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Retrograde, Primary and Secondary Bonding Materials with Tooth Substance.
Khan TN; Abidi SYA
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2018 Jan; 28(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 29290183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
