These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24082742)

  • 1. Establishment of norms of the beta angle to assess the sagittal discrepancy for Nellore district population.
    Prasad M; Reddy KP; Talapaneni AK; Chaitanya N; Bhaskar Reddy MV; Patil R
    J Nat Sci Biol Med; 2013 Jul; 4(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 24082742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative assessment of sagittal skeletal discrepancy: a cephalometric study.
    Aparna P; Kumar DN; Prasad M; Shamnur N; G AK; K R S; B R GK; Gupta N
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Apr; 9(4):ZC38-41. PubMed ID: 26023641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Floating norms for individualising the ANB angle and the WITS appraisal in orthodontic cephalometric analysis based on guiding variables.
    Paddenberg E; Proff P; Kirschneck C
    J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Jan; 84(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 34255093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Beta and ANB Angles for Evaluation of Sagittal Skeletal Discrepancy: A Cephalometric Study.
    Jajoo A; Agarkar SS; Sharma S; Gadhiya N; Sonawane S; Narkhede S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):739-742. PubMed ID: 29959305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(5):75-81. PubMed ID: 30427496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of Beta angle in assessing true anteroposterior apical base discrepancy in different growth patterns.
    Sundareswaran S; Kumar V
    J Nat Sci Biol Med; 2015; 6(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 25810649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance.
    Trivedi R; Bhattacharya A; Mehta F; Patel D; Parekh H; Gandhi V
    Prog Orthod; 2015 Feb; 16():3. PubMed ID: 25769138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three dimensional reliability analyses of currently used methods for assessment of sagittal jaw discrepancy.
    Almaqrami BS; Alhammadi MS; Cao B
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Apr; 10(4):e352-e360. PubMed ID: 29750096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A New Approach for the Assessment of True Maxillomandibular Sagittal Relationship: A Zeta Angle.
    Mohelay N; Dua N; Maqhbool SB; Shamsuddin S; Riyaz K; Sonawane V
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e57788. PubMed ID: 38721219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of popular sagittal cephalometric analyses for validity and reliability.
    Qamaruddin I; Alam MK; Shahid F; Tanveer S; Umer M; Amin E
    Saudi Dent J; 2018 Jan; 30(1):43-46. PubMed ID: 30166870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: the YEN angle.
    Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 19582259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tau Angle: A New Approach for Assessment of True Sagittal Maxillomandibular Relationship.
    Gupta P; Singh N; Tripathi T; Gopal R; Rai P
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(5):497-500. PubMed ID: 33623336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Sagittal Plane among Saudi Orthodontic Patients.
    Al-Hamlan N; Al-Eissa B; Al-Hiyasat AS; Albalawi FS; Ahmed AE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 26162253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new approach of assessing sagittal dysplasia: the W angle.
    Bhad WA; Nayak S; Doshi UH
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 21303811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized clinical trial to assess the sagittal effects of Transforce transverse appliance (TTA) and NiTi palatal expander (NPE) on skeletal class II malocclusion in growing patients during retention phase - A cephalometric study using a historical control group.
    Nagrik AP; Bhad WA; Chavan SJ; Doshi UH
    Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):722-731. PubMed ID: 33020047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cephalometric Floating Norms for the
    Perinetti G; Ceschi M; Scalia A; Contardo L
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():8740731. PubMed ID: 29850584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of Gender Dimorphism on Sagittal Cephalometry in Pakistani Population.
    Qamruddin I; Alam MK; Shahid F; Tanveer S; Mukhtiar M; Asim Z
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 May; 26(5):390-3. PubMed ID: 27225144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the Beta angle.
    Baik CY; Ververidou M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 15224065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.
    Kumar S; Valiathan A; Gautam P; Chakravarthy K; Jayaswal P
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23269690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of linear and angular measurements of maxillo-mandibular anteroposterior discrepancies.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia GM
    Clin Orthod Res; 1999 Feb; 2(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 10534977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.