176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24084548)
1. Subcuticular suture compared with staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Aabakke AJM; Krebs L; Pipper CB; Secher NJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 122(4):878-884. PubMed ID: 24084548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Figueroa D; Jauk VC; Szychowski JM; Garner R; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Hauth J; Tita AT
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
Frishman GN; Schwartz T; Hogan JW
J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section.
Sharma C; Verma A; Soni A; Thusoo M; Mahajan VK; Verma S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 24816689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
Fleisher J; Khalifeh A; Pettker C; Berghella V; Dabbish N; Mackeen AD
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.
Rodel RL; Gray KM; Quiner TE; Bodea Braescu A; Gerkin R; Perlow JH
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis.
Wang H; Hong S; Teng H; Qiao L; Yin H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3705-11. PubMed ID: 26785886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
Rousseau JA; Girard K; Turcot-Lemay L; Thomas N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient preferences for method of cesarean skin closure: secondary outcomes from a randomized trial.
Khalifeh A; Fleisher J; Gressel G; Berghella V; Leiby B; Mackeen AD
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Feb; 33(4):542-546. PubMed ID: 30189768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
Mackeen AD; Schuster M; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
Tuuli MG; Stout MJ; Martin S; Rampersad RM; Cahill AG; Macones GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suture Compared With Staples for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mackeen AD; Sullivan MV; Schuster M; Berghella V
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 35852281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Wound Complication Rates After Staples or Suture for Midline Vertical Skin Closure in Obese Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Kuroki LM; Mullen MM; Massad LS; Wu N; Liu J; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Hagemann AR; Thaker PH; McCourt CK; Novetsky AP
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 130(1):91-99. PubMed ID: 28594761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Staples versus subcuticular suture for cesarean skin closure in obese women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Han D; Feng L; Xu L; Li C; Zhang Q
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct; 51(8):102420. PubMed ID: 35688324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cosmetic outcomes of skin closure with tissue adhesive or staples in repeated cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial.
Cromi A; Laganà AS; Ghezzi F; Valdatta L; Casarin J; Cherubino M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Apr; 271():112-116. PubMed ID: 35183000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):CD003577. PubMed ID: 23152219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial.
Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Gottardi A; Cherubino M; Uccella S; Valdatta L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 203(1):36.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20417924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
