These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24084630)

  • 1. A cost-minimization analysis of an RCT of three retention methods.
    Tynelius GE; Lilja-Karlander E; Petrén S
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Aug; 36(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 24084630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ORTHODONTIC RETENTION. Studies of retention capacity, cost-effectiveness and long-term stability.
    Tynelius GE
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2014; (236):9-65. PubMed ID: 26685634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Five-year postretention outcomes of three retention methods--a randomized controlled trial.
    Edman Tynelius G; Petrén S; Bondemark L; Lilja-Karlander E
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Aug; 37(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 25452629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost analysis of two types of fixed maxillary retainers and a removable vacuum-formed maxillary retainer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sonesson M; Naraghi S; Bondemark L
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 Mar; 44(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 35021204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment after 1 year of retention--a randomized controlled trial.
    Edman Tynelius G; Bondemark L; Lilja-Karlander E
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):542-7. PubMed ID: 20080961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthodontic retention--three methods trialed.
    Cope JF; Lamont T
    Evid Based Dent; 2016 Mar; 17(1):29-30. PubMed ID: 27012577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vacuum-formed retainers and bonded retainers for dental stabilization-a randomized controlled trial. Part II: patients' perceptions 6 and 18 months after orthodontic treatment.
    Krämer A; Sjöström M; Hallman M; Feldmann I
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Apr; 43(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 32613244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Post-treatment stability after 5 years of retention with vacuum-formed and bonded retainers-a randomized controlled trial.
    Krämer A; Sjöström M; Apelthun C; Hallman M; Feldmann I
    Eur J Orthod; 2023 Feb; 45(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 35968668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A cost minimization analysis of early correction of anterior crossbite-a randomized controlled trial.
    Wiedel AP; Norlund A; Petrén S; Bondemark L
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 25940585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized controlled trial of three orthodontic retention methods in Class I four premolar extraction cases -- stability after 2 years in retention.
    Edman Tynelius G; Bondemark L; Lilja-Karlander E
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 May; 16(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 23324112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anterior tooth alignment: A comparison of orthodontic retention regimens 5 years posttreatment.
    Bjering R; Birkeland K; Vandevska-Radunovic V
    Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 25140669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vacuum-formed retainer versus bonded retainer for dental stabilization in the mandible-a randomized controlled trial. Part I: retentive capacity 6 and 18 months after orthodontic treatment.
    Krämer A; Sjöström M; Hallman M; Feldmann I
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Nov; 42(5):551-558. PubMed ID: 31665279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retention protocols and use of vacuum-formed retainers among specialist orthodontists.
    Meade MJ; Millett D
    J Orthod; 2013 Dec; 40(4):318-25. PubMed ID: 24297964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The origin and evolution of the Hawley retainer for the effectiveness to maintain tooth position after fixed orthodontic treatment compare to vacuum-formed retainer: A systematic review of RCTs.
    Outhaisavanh S; Liu Y; Song J
    Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):225-236. PubMed ID: 32201168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Factors affecting stability after fixed orthodontic treatment].
    Ren SS; Dai X; Ying M; Wang WX; Chang J; Hou ZM
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 53(9):599-603. PubMed ID: 30196619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome in relation to retention status: An 8-year follow-up.
    Steinnes J; Johnsen G; Kerosuo H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1027-1033. PubMed ID: 28554448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No differences seen in outcomes between three different methods of orthodontic retention.
    Walker M
    Evid Based Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):81-2. PubMed ID: 24071676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. eRME--rapid maxillary expansion in the economic way.
    Mahadevia S; Daruwala N; ; Vaghamshi M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):734. PubMed ID: 22406730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anterior tooth wear and retention type until 5 years after orthodontic treatment.
    Kuijpers MA; Kiliaridis S; Renkema A; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 19247853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Stability of the Results of Orthodontic Treatment and Gingival Health between Hawley and Vacuum-formed Retainers.
    Moslemzadeh SH; Sohrabi A; Rafighi A; Farshidnia S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr; 19(4):443-449. PubMed ID: 29728551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.