BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24086131)

  • 1. Host adaptation is contingent upon the infection route taken by pathogens.
    Martins NE; Faria VG; Teixeira L; Magalhães S; Sucena É
    PLoS Pathog; 2013; 9(9):e1003601. PubMed ID: 24086131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evolution of Drosophila resistance against different pathogens and infection routes entails no detectable maintenance costs.
    Faria VG; Martins NE; Paulo T; Teixeira L; Sucena É; Magalhães S
    Evolution; 2015 Nov; 69(11):2799-809. PubMed ID: 26496003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Drosophila melanogaster hosts coevolving with Pseudomonas entomophila pathogen show sex-specific patterns of local adaptation.
    Ahlawat N; Geeta Arun M; Maggu K; Jigisha ; Singh A; Prasad NG
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):77. PubMed ID: 35717176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A specific innate immune response silences the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a latent infection model in the Drosophila melanogaster host.
    Chen J; Lin G; Ma K; Li Z; Liégeois S; Ferrandon D
    PLoS Pathog; 2024 Jun; 20(6):e1012252. PubMed ID: 38833496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No major cost of evolved survivorship in
    Ahlawat N; Maggu K; Jigisha ; Arun MG; Meena A; Agarwala A; Prasad NG
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 May; 289(1974):20220532. PubMed ID: 35506222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevalence of local immune response against oral infection in a Drosophila/Pseudomonas infection model.
    Liehl P; Blight M; Vodovar N; Boccard F; Lemaitre B
    PLoS Pathog; 2006 Jun; 2(6):e56. PubMed ID: 16789834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gut physiology mediates a trade-off between adaptation to malnutrition and susceptibility to food-borne pathogens.
    Vijendravarma RK; Narasimha S; Chakrabarti S; Babin A; Kolly S; Lemaitre B; Kawecki TJ
    Ecol Lett; 2015 Oct; 18(10):1078-86. PubMed ID: 26249109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Host ecology shapes geographical variation for resistance to bacterial infection in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Corby-Harris V; Promislow DE
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 Jul; 77(4):768-76. PubMed ID: 18489569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effective but costly, evolved mechanisms of defense against a virulent opportunistic pathogen in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Ye YH; Chenoweth SF; McGraw EA
    PLoS Pathog; 2009 Apr; 5(4):e1000385. PubMed ID: 19381251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Profiling early infection responses: Pseudomonas aeruginosa eludes host defenses by suppressing antimicrobial peptide gene expression.
    Apidianakis Y; Mindrinos MN; Xiao W; Lau GW; Baldini RL; Davis RW; Rahme LG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Feb; 102(7):2573-8. PubMed ID: 15695583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptation to a bacterial pathogen in
    Sharda S; Kawecki TJ; Hollis B
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Feb; 12(2):e8543. PubMed ID: 35169448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genotype-by-environment interactions and adaptation to local temperature affect immunity and fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lazzaro BP; Flores HA; Lorigan JG; Yourth CP
    PLoS Pathog; 2008 Mar; 4(3):e1000025. PubMed ID: 18369474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No apparent cost of evolved immune response in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Gupta V; Venkatesan S; Chatterjee M; Syed ZA; Nivsarkar V; Prasad NG
    Evolution; 2016 Apr; 70(4):934-43. PubMed ID: 26932243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic, molecular and physiological basis of variation in Drosophila gut immunocompetence.
    Bou Sleiman MS; Osman D; Massouras A; Hoffmann AA; Lemaitre B; Deplancke B
    Nat Commun; 2015 Jul; 6():7829. PubMed ID: 26213329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolution of pathogen-specific improved survivorship post-infection in populations of Drosophila melanogaster adapted to larval crowding.
    Kapila R; Kashyap M; Poddar S; Gangwal S; Prasad NGG
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250055. PubMed ID: 33852596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oral Bacterial Infection and Shedding in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Siva-Jothy JA; Prakash A; Vasanthakrishnan RB; Monteith KM; Vale PF
    J Vis Exp; 2018 May; (135):. PubMed ID: 29912178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pseudomonas aeruginosa RhlR is required to neutralize the cellular immune response in a Drosophila melanogaster oral infection model.
    Limmer S; Haller S; Drenkard E; Lee J; Yu S; Kocks C; Ausubel FM; Ferrandon D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Oct; 108(42):17378-83. PubMed ID: 21987808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Absence of reproduction-immunity trade-off in male Drosophila melanogaster evolving under differential sexual selection.
    Syed ZA; Gupta V; Arun MG; Dhiman A; Nandy B; Prasad NG
    BMC Evol Biol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):13. PubMed ID: 31992187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genotype and diet affect resistance, survival, and fecundity but not fecundity tolerance.
    Kutzer MAM; Kurtz J; Armitage SAO
    J Evol Biol; 2018 Jan; 31(1):159-171. PubMed ID: 29150962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual activity increases resistance against Pseudomonas entomophila in male Drosophila melanogaster.
    Gupta V; Ali ZS; Prasad NG
    BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Sep; 13():185. PubMed ID: 24010544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.