These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24086605)

  • 1. A wavelet-based noise reduction algorithm and its clinical evaluation in cochlear implants.
    Ye H; Deng G; Mauger SJ; Hersbach AA; Dawson PW; Heasman JM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75662. PubMed ID: 24086605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
    Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cochlear implant optimized noise reduction.
    Mauger SJ; Arora K; Dawson PW
    J Neural Eng; 2012 Dec; 9(6):065007. PubMed ID: 23187159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of Noise Reduction Algorithm ClearVoice in Cochlear Implant Processing: Effects on Noise Tolerance and Speech Intelligibility in Noise in Relation to Spectral Resolution.
    Dingemanse JG; Goedegebure A
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):357-67. PubMed ID: 25479412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus
    Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech enhancement based on neural networks improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implant users.
    Goehring T; Bolner F; Monaghan JJ; van Dijk B; Zarowski A; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():183-194. PubMed ID: 27913315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptually optimized gain function for cochlear implant signal-to-noise ratio based noise reduction.
    Mauger SJ; Dawson PW; Hersbach AA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):327-36. PubMed ID: 22280595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sparse Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Strategy for Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Lutman ME; Ewert SD; Li G; Bleeck S
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of speech recognition in noise with cochlear implants and dynamic FM.
    Wolfe J; Schafer EC; Heldner B; Mülder H; Ward E; Vincent B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009; 20(7):409-21. PubMed ID: 19928395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech understanding performance of cochlear implant subjects using time-frequency masking-based noise reduction.
    Qazi Ou; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 May; 59(5):1364-73. PubMed ID: 22345522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Speech Recognition of Cochlear Implant Recipients Using Adaptive, Digital Remote Microphone Technology and a Speech Enhancement Sound Processing Algorithm.
    Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E; Agrawal S; Koch D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):502-508. PubMed ID: 26055839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants.
    Gifford RH; Olund AP; DeJong M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):623-632. PubMed ID: 22192607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving Speech Recognition in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users by Listening With the Better Ear.
    Kan A
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518772963. PubMed ID: 29708063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise.
    Gifford RH; Revit LJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(7):441-51; quiz 487-8. PubMed ID: 20807480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of a transient noise reduction algorithm on speech intelligibility in noise, noise tolerance and perceived annoyance in cochlear implant users.
    Dingemanse JG; Vroegop JL; Goedegebure A
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(5):360-369. PubMed ID: 29334269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of directional microphone and adaptive multichannel noise reduction algorithm on cochlear implant performance.
    Chung K; Zeng FG; Acker KN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2216-27. PubMed ID: 17069317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Voice Track multiband single-channel modified Wiener-filter noise reduction system for cochlear implants: patients' outcomes and subjective appraisal.
    Guevara N; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Bebear JP; Ardoint M; Saaï S; Gnansia D; Hoen M; Romanet P; Lavieille JP
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Aug; 55(8):431-8. PubMed ID: 27108635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conversion of adult Nucleus® 5 cochlear implant users to the Nucleus® 6 system.
    De Ceulaer G; Swinnen F; Pascoal D; Philips B; Killian M; James C; Govaerts PJ; Dhooge I
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jul; 16(4):222-32. PubMed ID: 25284643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.