These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
48. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Speech processing for cochlear implants with the discrete wavelet transform: feasibility study and performance evaluation. Paglialonga A; Tognola G; Baselli G; Parazzini M; Ravazzani P; Grandori F Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():3763-6. PubMed ID: 17946580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. ForwardFocus with cochlear implant recipients in spatially separated and fluctuating competing signals - introduction of a reference metric. Hey M; Hocke T; Böhnke B; Mauger SJ Int J Audiol; 2019 Dec; 58(12):869-878. PubMed ID: 31464542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Self-Adjustment of Upper Electrical Stimulation Levels in CI Programming and the Effect on Auditory Functioning. Vroegop JL; Dingemanse JG; van der Schroeff MP; Metselaar RM; Goedegebure A Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):e232-e240. PubMed ID: 28125445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Evaluation of different signal processing options in unilateral and bilateral cochlear freedom implant recipients using R-Space background noise. Brockmeyer AM; Potts LG J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Feb; 22(2):65-80. PubMed ID: 21463562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise. Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Environment-specific noise suppression for improved speech intelligibility by cochlear implant users. Hu Y; Loizou PC J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jun; 127(6):3689-95. PubMed ID: 20550267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Improved Environment-Aware-Based Noise Reduction System for Cochlear Implant Users Based on a Knowledge Transfer Approach: Development and Usability Study. Li LP; Han JY; Zheng WZ; Huang RJ; Lai YH J Med Internet Res; 2021 Oct; 23(10):e25460. PubMed ID: 34709193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effects of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation on Binaural Listening Tasks for Younger and Older Adults. Smeal M; Snapp H; Ausili S; Holcomb M; Prentiss S Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(5):377-387. PubMed ID: 35636400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user. Van Hoesel R; Ramsden R; Odriscoll M Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 11951849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A multi-band environment-adaptive approach to noise suppression for cochlear implants. Saki F; Mirzahasanloo T; Kehtarnavaz N Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():1699-702. PubMed ID: 25570302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]