572 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24088296)
1. Gene expression profiling and expanded immunohistochemistry tests to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer management: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Ward S; Scope A; Rafia R; Pandor A; Harnan S; Evans P; Wyld L
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Oct; 17(44):1-302. PubMed ID: 24088296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic analysis.
Harnan S; Tappenden P; Cooper K; Stevens J; Bessey A; Rafia R; Ward S; Wong R; Stein RC; Brown J
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(30):1-328. PubMed ID: 31264581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING AND EXPANDED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY TESTS TO GUIDE SELECTION OF CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS IN BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.
Scope A; Essat M; Pandor A; Rafia R; Ward SE; Wyld L; Cross S; Woods HB
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(1):32-45. PubMed ID: 28486999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gene expression profiling for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in women with early breast cancer: an evidence-based and economic analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(23):1-57. PubMed ID: 23074401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Williams C; Brunskill S; Altman D; Briggs A; Campbell H; Clarke M; Glanville J; Gray A; Harris A; Johnston K; Lodge M
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Sep; 10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. PubMed ID: 16959170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.
Ontario Health (Quality)
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2020; 20(10):1-234. PubMed ID: 32284770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of late distant recurrence in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: a prospective comparison of the breast-cancer index (BCI) assay, 21-gene recurrence score, and IHC4 in the TransATAC study population.
Sgroi DC; Sestak I; Cuzick J; Zhang Y; Schnabel CA; Schroeder B; Erlander MG; Dunbier A; Sidhu K; Lopez-Knowles E; Goss PE; Dowsett M
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Oct; 14(11):1067-1076. PubMed ID: 24035531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is gene array testing to be considered routine now?
Paik S
Breast; 2011 Oct; 20 Suppl 3():S87-91. PubMed ID: 22015300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. OPTIMA prelim: a randomised feasibility study of personalised care in the treatment of women with early breast cancer.
Stein RC; Dunn JA; Bartlett JM; Campbell AF; Marshall A; Hall P; Rooshenas L; Morgan A; Poole C; Pinder SE; Cameron DA; Stallard N; Donovan JL; McCabe C; Hughes-Davies L; Makris A;
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Feb; 20(10):xxiii-xxix, 1-201. PubMed ID: 26867046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic review of the clinical and economic value of gene expression profiles for invasive early breast cancer available in Europe.
Blok EJ; Bastiaannet E; van den Hout WB; Liefers GJ; Smit VTHBM; Kroep JR; van de Velde CJH
Cancer Treat Rev; 2018 Jan; 62():74-90. PubMed ID: 29175678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.
Forbes C; Shirran L; Bagnall AM; Duffy S; ter Riet G
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(28):1-110. PubMed ID: 11701100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost effectiveness of gene expression profiling for early stage breast cancer: a decision-analytic model.
Yang M; Rajan S; Issa AM
Cancer; 2012 Oct; 118(20):5163-70. PubMed ID: 22359236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness analysis of multigene expression profiling assays to guide adjuvant therapy decisions in women with invasive early-stage breast cancer.
Hannouf MB; Zaric GS; Blanchette P; Brezden-Masley C; Paulden M; McCabe C; Raphael J; Brackstone M
Pharmacogenomics J; 2020 Feb; 20(1):27-46. PubMed ID: 31130722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Oncotype DX breast Recurrence Score testing on adjuvant chemotherapy use in early breast cancer: Real world experience in Greater Manchester, UK.
Loncaster J; Armstrong A; Howell S; Wilson G; Welch R; Chittalia A; Valentine WJ; Bundred NJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 43(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 28111076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Personalized treatment of women with early breast cancer: a risk-group specific cost-effectiveness analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy accounting for companion prognostic tests OncotypeDX and Adjuvant!Online.
Jahn B; Rochau U; Kurzthaler C; Hubalek M; Miksad R; Sroczynski G; Paulden M; Bundo M; Stenehjem D; Brixner D; Krahn M; Siebert U
BMC Cancer; 2017 Oct; 17(1):685. PubMed ID: 29037213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A systematic review and economic evaluation of intraoperative tests [RD-100i one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) system and Metasin test] for detecting sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer.
Huxley N; Jones-Hughes T; Coelho H; Snowsill T; Cooper C; Meng Y; Hyde C; Mújica-Mota R
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jan; 19(2):v-xxv, 1-215. PubMed ID: 25586547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A combination of Nottingham prognostic index and IHC4 score predicts pathological complete response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer.
Tan W; Luo W; Jia W; Liang G; Xie X; Zheng W; Song E; Su F; Gong C
Oncotarget; 2016 Dec; 7(52):87312-87322. PubMed ID: 27894097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of gene expression profiling tests on breast cancer outcomes.
Marchionni L; Wilson RF; Marinopoulos SS; Wolff AC; Parmigiani G; Bass EB; Goodman SN
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2007 Dec; (160):1-105. PubMed ID: 18457476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rituximab for the first-line treatment of stage III-IV follicular lymphoma (review of Technology Appraisal No. 110): a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Papaioannou D; Rafia R; Rathbone J; Stevenson M; Buckley Woods H; Stevens J
Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(37):1-253, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 23021127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer: A comparison of no chemotherapy and first, second, and third generation regimens for patients with differing prognoses.
Campbell HE; Epstein D; Bloomfield D; Griffin S; Manca A; Yarnold J; Bliss J; Johnson L; Earl H; Poole C; Hiller L; Dunn J; Hopwood P; Barrett-Lee P; Ellis P; Cameron D; Harris AL; Gray AM; Sculpher MJ
Eur J Cancer; 2011 Nov; 47(17):2517-30. PubMed ID: 21741831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
