These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24088814)

  • 41. Same score, different message: perceptions of offender risk depend on Static-99R risk communication format.
    Varela JG; Boccaccini MT; Cuervo VA; Murrie DC; Clark JW
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Oct; 38(5):418-27. PubMed ID: 24377910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effectiveness of a sex offender treatment programme: a risk band analysis.
    Woodrow AC; Bright DA
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2011 Feb; 55(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 20081095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assessing dynamic violence risk: Common language risk levels and recidivism rates for the Violence Risk Scale.
    Olver ME; Mundt JC; Hogan NR; Coupland RBA; Eggert JE; Higgs T; Lewis K; Cortoni F; Gordon A; Morgan PJ; Wong SCP
    Psychol Assess; 2022 Jun; 34(6):528-545. PubMed ID: 35175077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.
    Rettenberger M; Matthes A; Boer DP; Eher R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 19168639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Female sex offender recidivism: a large-scale empirical analysis.
    Sandler JC; Freeman NJ
    Sex Abuse; 2009 Dec; 21(4):455-73. PubMed ID: 19901239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A time series modeling approach in risk appraisal of violent and sexual recidivism.
    Bani-Yaghoub M; Fedoroff JP; Curry S; Amundsen DE
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Oct; 34(5):349-66. PubMed ID: 19399599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The predictive validity of common risk assessment tools in men with intellectual disabilities and problematic sexual behaviors.
    Fedoroff JP; Richards D; Ranger R; Curry S
    Res Dev Disabil; 2016 Oct; 57():29-38. PubMed ID: 27372881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sexual offender recidivism risk: what we know and what we need to know.
    Hanson RK; Morton KE; Harris AJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():154-66; discussion 236-46. PubMed ID: 12839896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Refusers, dropouts, and completers: measuring sex offender treatment efficacy.
    Seager JA; Jellicoe D; Dhaliwal GK
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2004 Oct; 48(5):600-12. PubMed ID: 15358934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Outcome evaluation of a high-intensity inpatient sex offender treatment program.
    Olver ME; Wong SC; Nicholaichuk TP
    J Interpers Violence; 2009 Mar; 24(3):522-36. PubMed ID: 18458350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sex crime recidivism. Evaluation of a sexual offender treatment program.
    Schweitzer R; Dwyer J
    J Interpers Violence; 2003 Nov; 18(11):1292-310. PubMed ID: 19774766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Substance abuse among high-risk sexual offenders: do measures of lifetime history of substance abuse add to the prediction of recidivism over actuarial risk assessment instruments?
    Looman J; Abracen J
    J Interpers Violence; 2011 Mar; 26(4):683-700. PubMed ID: 20587448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Predicting the likelihood of future sexual recidivism: pilot study findings from a California sex offender risk project and cross-validation of the Static-99.
    Sreenivasan S; Garrick T; Norris R; Cusworth-Walker S; Weinberger LE; Essres G; Turner S; Fain T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4):454-68. PubMed ID: 18086738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Appraising the risk matrix 2000 static sex offender risk assessment tool.
    Tully RJ; Browne KD
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2015 Feb; 59(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 24146356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The predictive properties of dynamic sex offender risk assessment instruments: A meta-analysis.
    van den Berg JW; Smid W; Schepers K; Wever E; van Beek D; Janssen E; Gijs L
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Feb; 30(2):179-191. PubMed ID: 28368169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. An examination of latent constructs of dynamic sexual violence risk and need as a function of indigenous and nonindigenous ancestry.
    Olver ME; Kingston DA; Sowden JN
    Psychol Serv; 2021 Nov; 18(4):484-496. PubMed ID: 31999157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An investigation of the validity and reliability of the Criminal Sentiments Scale in a sample of treated sex offenders.
    Witte TD; Di Placido C; Gu D; Wong SC
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Jul; 18(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 16988891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Is more better? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders.
    Seto MC
    Psychol Assess; 2005 Jun; 17(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 16029103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. How useful are psychometric scores in predicting recidivism for treated sex offenders?
    Barnett GD; Wakeling HC; Mandeville-Norden R; Rakestrow J
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2012 May; 56(3):420-46. PubMed ID: 21518697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Differences in personality and risk characteristics in sex, violent and general offenders.
    Craig LA; Browne KD; Beech A; Stringer I
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2006; 16(3):183-94. PubMed ID: 16838386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.