These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24088814)

  • 61. Risk and protective factors for recidivism among juveniles who have offended sexually.
    Spice A; Viljoen JL; Latzman NE; Scalora MJ; Ullman D
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Aug; 25(4):347-69. PubMed ID: 23033066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The recidivism rates of female sexual offenders are low: a meta-analysis.
    Cortoni F; Hanson RK; Coache MÈ
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):387-401. PubMed ID: 21098822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A longitudinal examination of sex offender recidivism prior to and following the implementation of SORN.
    Tewksbury R; Jennings WG; Zgoba KM
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):308-28. PubMed ID: 21898579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Optimizing risk mitigation in management of sexual offenders: a structural model.
    Lamade R; Gabriel A; Prentky R
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 21565406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Recent research (N = 9,305) underscores the importance of using age-stratified actuarial tables in sex offender risk assessments.
    Wollert R; Cramer E; Waggoner J; Skelton A; Vess J
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):471-90. PubMed ID: 21098823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Effectiveness of sex offender treatment for psychopathic sexual offenders.
    Doren DM; Yates PM
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2008 Apr; 52(2):234-45. PubMed ID: 17615428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Sex offender risk assessment: A reexamination of the coffee can study.
    Buttars A; Huss MT; Brack C
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():31-6. PubMed ID: 26286489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Assessing protective factors for sexually violent offending with the SAPROF.
    de Vries Robbé M; de Vogel V; Koster K; Bogaerts S
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 25210106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Sexual Violence Risk Assessment With Indigenous Men: Context, Controversies, and Current Findings.
    Olver ME; Stockdale KC
    Curr Psychiatry Rep; 2021 Jul; 23(8):48. PubMed ID: 34196806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Predicting recidivism in sex offenders with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS).
    Walters GD; Deming A; Casbon T
    Assessment; 2015 Apr; 22(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 25013121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: a comparison of three actuarial scales.
    Hanson RK; Thornton D
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Feb; 24(1):119-36. PubMed ID: 10693322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type.
    Bartosh DL; Garby T; Lewis D; Gray S
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2003 Aug; 47(4):422-38. PubMed ID: 12971183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Comparing sexual offender treatment efficacy: mainstream sexual offenders and sexual offenders with special needs.
    Keeling JA; Rose JL; Beech AR
    J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2007 Jun; 32(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 17613682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies.
    Hanson RK; Morton-Bourgon KE
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2005 Dec; 73(6):1154-63. PubMed ID: 16392988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Preventing sexual violence: can examination of offense location inform sex crime policy?
    Colombino N; Mercado CC; Levenson J; Jeglic E
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 21531024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The development of the crime scene behavior risk measure for sexual offense recidivism.
    Dahle KP; Biedermann J; Lehmann RJ; Gallasch-Nemitz F
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Dec; 38(6):569-79. PubMed ID: 24707910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Comparing sex offender risk assessment measures on a UK sample.
    Craig LA; Browne KD; Stringer I
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2004 Feb; 48(1):7-27. PubMed ID: 14969113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Cross-Validation of the Revised Version of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG-R) in a Sample of Individuals Convicted of Sexual Offenses.
    Gregório Hertz P; Eher R; Etzler S; Rettenberger M
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Feb; 33(1):63-87. PubMed ID: 31010400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Predicting reoffense for community-based sexual offenders: an analysis of 30 years of data.
    Romine RE; Miner MH; Poulin D; Dwyer SM; Berg D
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Oct; 24(5):501-14. PubMed ID: 22645230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Merging developmental and criminal career perspectives: implications for risk assessment and risk prediction of violent/sexual recidivism in adult sexual aggressors of women.
    Cale J; Lussier P
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Apr; 24(2):107-32. PubMed ID: 21788437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.