397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24088968)
1. Accuracy of acetabular component position in hip arthroplasty.
Barrack RL; Krempec JA; Clohisy JC; McDonald DJ; Ricci WM; Ruh EL; Nunley RM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Oct; 95(19):1760-8. PubMed ID: 24088968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Poor accuracy of freehand cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty.
Bosker BH; Verheyen CC; Horstmann WG; Tulp NJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2007 Jul; 127(5):375-9. PubMed ID: 17297597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [USE OF SMARTPHONE IN ACETABULAR COMPONENT ANGLE MEASUREMENT DURING TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY].
Wang J; Xu R; Kang X; Zhang H
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 30(9):1061-1064. PubMed ID: 29786355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical Approach and Hip Laterality Affect Accuracy of Acetabular Component Placement in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Crawford DA; Adams JB; Hobbs GR; Lombardi AJV; Berend KR
Surg Technol Int; 2019 Nov; 35():377-385. PubMed ID: 31524283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital Radiography in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Technique and Radiographic Results.
Penenberg BL; Samagh SP; Rajaee SS; Woehnl A; Brien WW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Feb; 100(3):226-235. PubMed ID: 29406344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The importance of acetabular component position in total hip arthroplasty.
Daines BK; Dennis DA
Orthop Clin North Am; 2012 Nov; 43(5):e23-34. PubMed ID: 23102418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.
Merle C; Grammatopoulos G; Waldstein W; Pegg E; Pandit H; Aldinger PR; Gill HS; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Nov; 95(22):e172. PubMed ID: 24257672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Improves Component Position During Anterior Hip Arthroplasty.
Jennings JD; Iorio J; Kleiner MT; Gaughan JP; Star AM
Orthopedics; 2015 Nov; 38(11):e970-5. PubMed ID: 26558676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraoperative evaluation of acetabular cup position during anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: are we accurately interpreting?
Delagrammaticas DE; Ochenjele G; Rosenthal BD; Assenmacher B; Manning DW; Stover MD
Hip Int; 2020 Jan; 30(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 31387397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy and Precision of Acetabular Component Placement With Imageless Navigation in Obese Patients.
Buller LT; McLawhorn AS; Romero JA; Sculco PK; Mayman DJ
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Apr; 34(4):693-699. PubMed ID: 30616976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Highly crosslinked polyethylene wear rates and acetabular component orientation: a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Teeter MG; Lanting BA; Naudie DD; McCalden RW; Howard JL; MacDonald SJ
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jul; 100-B(7):891-897. PubMed ID: 29954202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Planning-Assisted and Conventional Acetabular Cup Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Sariali E; Boukhelifa N; Catonne Y; Pascal Moussellard H
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 98(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 26791031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.
D'Lima DD; Urquhart AG; Buehler KO; Walker RH; Colwell CW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 82(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 10724224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adoption of Robotic vs Fluoroscopic Guidance in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is Acetabular Positioning Improved in the Learning Curve?
Kamara E; Robinson J; Bas MA; Rodriguez JA; Hepinstall MS
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):125-130. PubMed ID: 27499519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Targeting a New Safe Zone: A Step in the Development of Patient-Specific Component Positioning for Total Hip Arthroplasty.
McLawhorn AS; Sculco PK; Weeks KD; Nam D; Mayman DJ
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2015 Jun; 44(6):270-6. PubMed ID: 26046997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does fluoroscopy improve acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty?
Beamer BS; Morgan JH; Barr C; Weaver MJ; Vrahas MS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 472(12):3953-62. PubMed ID: 25238804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reassessment of computerized wear measurement for total hip arthroplasty with correction for projectional image distortion: a brief follow-up report.
Kraay MJ; Moore RD; Martell JM; Rimnac CM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Aug; 92(9):1858-67. PubMed ID: 20686060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pelvic positioning in the supine position leads to more consistent orientation of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty.
Grammatopoulos G; Gofton W; Cochran M; Dobransky J; Carli A; Abdelbary H; Gill HS; Beaulé PE
Bone Joint J; 2018 Oct; 100-B(10):1280-1288. PubMed ID: 30295537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Femoral-Acetabular Mating: The Effect of Femoral and Combined Anteversion on Cross-Linked Polyethylene Wear.
Mayeda BF; Haw JG; Battenberg AK; Schmalzried TP
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Oct; 33(10):3320-3324. PubMed ID: 29970327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of the transverse acetabular ligament for acetabular component orientation in total hip replacement: an analysis of acetabular component position and range of movement using navigation software.
Kalteis T; Sendtner E; Beverland D; Archbold PA; Hube R; Schuster T; Renkawitz T; Grifka J
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Aug; 93(8):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21768623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
