26 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24089748)
1. Prediction of toluene/water partition coefficients of SAMPL9 compounds: comparison of the molecular dynamics force fields GAFF/RESP and GAFF/IPolQ-Mod + LJ-fit.
Sprick M; Raabe G
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2024 Jan; 26(4):3126-3138. PubMed ID: 38189577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding the sources of error in MBAR through asymptotic analysis.
Li XS; Van Koten B; Dinner AR; Thiede EH
J Chem Phys; 2023 Jun; 158(21):. PubMed ID: 37259996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comment on "On the Crooks fluctuation theorem and the Jarzynski equality" [J. Chem. Phys. 129, 091101 (2008)].
Adib AB
J Chem Phys; 2009 Jun; 130(24):247101. PubMed ID: 19566186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian Multistate Bennett Acceptance Ratio Methods.
Ding X
J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Mar; 20(5):1878-1888. PubMed ID: 38385533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A New Approach for Estimating the Free Energy Differences among Multiple Thermodynamic States in Statistical Simulations.
Yang J; Singer SJ
J Phys Chem Lett; 2023 Jun; 14(22):5127-5133. PubMed ID: 37249593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Building a macro-mixing dual-basin Gō model using the Multistate Bennett Acceptance Ratio.
Shinobu A; Kobayashi C; Matsunaga Y; Sugita Y
Biophys Physicobiol; 2019; 16():310-321. PubMed ID: 31984186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study of SQ109 analogs binding to mycobacterium MmpL3 transporter using MD simulations and alchemical relative binding free energy calculations.
Stampolaki M; Stylianakis I; Zgurskaya HI; Kolocouris A
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2023 Jun; 37(5-6):245-264. PubMed ID: 37129848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does Hamiltonian Replica Exchange via Lambda-Hopping Enhance the Sampling in Alchemical Free Energy Calculations?
Procacci P
Molecules; 2022 Jul; 27(14):. PubMed ID: 35889299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of multistate Bennett acceptance ratio method for free-energy calculations from enhanced sampling and free-energy perturbation.
Matsunaga Y; Kamiya M; Oshima H; Jung J; Ito S; Sugita Y
Biophys Rev; 2022 Dec; 14(6):1503-1512. PubMed ID: 36659993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Edited by T. J. Bennett; Items.
Daniels Tex Med J; 1888 Jun; 3(12):525-529. PubMed ID: 36953059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple Bennett acceptance ratio made easy for replica exchange simulations.
Procacci P
J Chem Phys; 2013 Sep; 139(12):124105. PubMed ID: 24089748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Numerical verification of the generalized Crooks nonequilibrium work theorem for non-Hamiltonian molecular dynamics simulations.
Chelli R; Marsili S; Barducci A; Procacci P
J Chem Phys; 2007 Jul; 127(3):034110. PubMed ID: 17655434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Generalization of the Jarzynski and Crooks nonequilibrium work theorems in molecular dynamics simulations.
Chelli R; Marsili S; Barducci A; Procacci P
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2007 May; 75(5 Pt 1):050101. PubMed ID: 17677005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recovering the Crooks equation for dynamical systems in the isothermal-isobaric ensemble: a strategy based on the equations of motion.
Chelli R; Marsili S; Barducci A; Procacci P
J Chem Phys; 2007 Jan; 126(4):044502. PubMed ID: 17286482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics using soft-core interactions.
Hritz J; Oostenbrink C
J Chem Phys; 2008 Apr; 128(14):144121. PubMed ID: 18412437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
