BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24089903)

  • 1. Characterization of a constrained paired-view technique in iterative reconstruction for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu G; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101901. PubMed ID: 24089903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
    Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Goodsitt MM; Hadjiiski LM; Ge J; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3781-95. PubMed ID: 17089843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.
    Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Goodsitt M; Carson PL; Hadjiiski L; Schmitz A; Eberhard JW; Claus BE
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5703-12. PubMed ID: 21992385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel pre-processing technique for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Kim H; Lee T; Hong J; Sabir S; Lee JR; Choi YW; Kim HH; Chae EY; Cho S
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):417-425. PubMed ID: 28032909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of time-efficient reconstruction methods in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Svahn TM; Houssami N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):331-6. PubMed ID: 25855075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
    Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
    Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task-based performance analysis of FBP, SART and ML for digital breast tomosynthesis using signal CNR and Channelised Hotelling Observers.
    Van de Sompel D; Brady SM; Boone J
    Med Image Anal; 2011 Feb; 15(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 20713313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.
    Gong Z; Klanian K; Patel T; Sullivan O; Williams MB
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7580-92. PubMed ID: 23231306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Voting strategy for artifact reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu T; Moore RH; Kopans DB
    Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2461-71. PubMed ID: 16898449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
    Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
    Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-attenuation artifact reduction in breast tomosynthesis using a novel reconstruction algorithm.
    Dustler M; Wicklein J; Förnvik H; Boita J; Bakic P; Lång K
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():21-26. PubMed ID: 31153567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A dual-view digital tomosynthesis imaging technique for improved chest imaging.
    Zhong Y; Lai CJ; Wang T; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5238-51. PubMed ID: 26328973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Weighted simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique for tomosynthesis imaging of objects with high-attenuation features.
    Levakhina YM; Müller J; Duschka RL; Vogt F; Barkhausen J; Buzug TM
    Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031106. PubMed ID: 23464286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry.
    Bliznakova K; Kolitsi Z; Speller RD; Horrocks JA; Tromba G; Pallikarakis N
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1893-903. PubMed ID: 20443511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multigrid reconstruction with block-iterative updates for breast tomosynthesis.
    Michielsen K; Nuyts J
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6537-48. PubMed ID: 26520744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I; Ghetti C
    Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1199-207. PubMed ID: 19472626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combined iterative reconstruction and image-domain decomposition for dual energy CT using total-variation regularization.
    Dong X; Niu T; Zhu L
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051909. PubMed ID: 24784388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The weighted-distance scheme: a globally optimizing projection ordering method for ART.
    Mueller K; Yagel R; Cornhill JF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Apr; 16(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 9101332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.