202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24089924)
21. Patient motion effects on the quantification of regional myocardial blood flow with dynamic PET imaging.
Hunter CR; Klein R; Beanlands RS; deKemp RA
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1829. PubMed ID: 27036580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Verification of the effect of data-driven brain motion correction on PET imaging.
Odagiri H; Watabe H; Takanami K; Akimoto K; Usui A; Kawakami H; Katsuki A; Uetake N; Dendo Y; Tanaka Y; Kodama H; Takase K; Kaneta T
PLoS One; 2024; 19(7):e0301919. PubMed ID: 38968191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dynamic PET image reconstruction integrating temporal regularization associated with respiratory motion correction for applications in oncology.
Merlin T; Visvikis D; Fernandez P; Lamare F
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045012. PubMed ID: 29339575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of respiratory motion correction and spatial resolution on lesion detection in PET: a simulation study based on real MR dynamic data.
Polycarpou I; Tsoumpas C; King AP; Marsden PK
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 59(3):697-713. PubMed ID: 24442386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cardiac motion and spillover correction for quantitative PET imaging using dynamic MRI.
Marchesseau S; Totman JJ; Fadil H; Leek FAA; Chaal J; Richards M; Chan M; Reilhac A
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):726-737. PubMed ID: 30575047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Image-derived input function in PET brain studies: blood-based methods are resistant to motion artifacts.
Zanotti-Fregonara P; Liow JS; Comtat C; Zoghbi SS; Zhang Y; Pike VW; Fujita M; Innis RB
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Sep; 33(9):982-9. PubMed ID: 22760300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Body motion detection and correction in cardiac PET: Phantom and human studies.
Sun T; Petibon Y; Han PK; Ma C; Kim SJW; Alpert NM; El Fakhri G; Ouyang J
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4898-4906. PubMed ID: 31508827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Data-driven voluntary body motion detection and non-rigid event-by-event correction for static and dynamic PET.
Lu Y; Gallezot JD; Naganawa M; Ren S; Fontaine K; Wu J; Onofrey JA; Toyonaga T; Boutagy N; Mulnix T; Panin VY; Casey ME; Carson RE; Liu C
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(6):065002. PubMed ID: 30695768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An objective evaluation method for head motion estimation in PET-Motion corrected centroid-of-distribution.
Sun C; Revilla EM; Zhang J; Fontaine K; Toyonaga T; Gallezot JD; Mulnix T; Onofrey JA; Carson RE; Lu Y
Neuroimage; 2022 Dec; 264():119678. PubMed ID: 36261057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of Data-Driven Rigid Motion Correction in Clinical Brain PET Imaging.
Spangler-Bickell MG; Hurley SA; Pirasteh A; Perlman SB; Deller T; McMillan AB
J Nucl Med; 2022 Oct; 63(10):1604-1610. PubMed ID: 35086896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robustness of post-reconstruction and direct kinetic parameter estimates under rigid head motion in dynamic brain PET imaging.
Kotasidis FA; Angelis GI; Anton-Rodriguez JM; Zaidi H
Phys Med; 2018 Sep; 53():40-55. PubMed ID: 30241754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A systematic performance evaluation of head motion correction techniques for 3 commercial PET scanners using a reproducible experimental acquisition protocol.
Inomata T; Watanuki S; Odagiri H; Nambu T; Karakatsanis NA; Ito H; Watabe H; Tashiro M; Shidahara M
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Jul; 33(7):459-470. PubMed ID: 30924048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Respiratory phase alignment improves blood-flow quantification in Rb82 PET myocardial perfusion imaging.
Pourmoghaddas A; Klein R; deKemp RA; Wells RG
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):022503. PubMed ID: 23387770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Frame-to-frame image realignment assessment tool for dynamic brain positron emission tomography.
Dinelle K; Ngo H; Blinder S; Vafai N; Topping G; Sossi V
Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):773-81. PubMed ID: 21452715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Correction of head movements in positron emission tomography using point source tracking system: a simulation study.
Nazarparvar B; Shamsaei M; Rajabi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2012 Jan; 26(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 21953210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Motion compensation for brain PET imaging using wireless MR active markers in simultaneous PET-MR: phantom and non-human primate studies.
Huang C; Ackerman JL; Petibon Y; Normandin MD; Brady TJ; El Fakhri G; Ouyang J
Neuroimage; 2014 May; 91():129-37. PubMed ID: 24418501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Simulation Study of a Frame-Based Motion Correction Algorithm for Positron Emission Imaging.
Espinós-Morató H; Cascales-Picó D; Vergara M; Hernández-Martínez Á; Benlloch Baviera JM; Rodríguez-Álvarez MJ
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(8):. PubMed ID: 33917742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. MR-PET head motion correction based on co-registration of multicontrast MR images.
Chen Z; Sforazzini F; Baran J; Close T; Shah NJ; Egan GF
Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Sep; 42(13):4081-4091. PubMed ID: 30604898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. 3D PET image reconstruction including both motion correction and registration directly into an MR or stereotaxic spatial atlas.
Gravel P; Verhaeghe J; Reader AJ
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jan; 58(1):105-26. PubMed ID: 23221063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. MR-based motion correction for PET imaging using wired active MR microcoils in simultaneous PET-MR: phantom study.
Huang C; Ackerman JL; Petibon Y; Brady TJ; El Fakhri G; Ouyang J
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041910. PubMed ID: 24694141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
