These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24090355)

  • 61. An in vivo and in vitro investigation of the use of ICDAS, DIAGNOdent pen and CarieScan PRO for the detection and assessment of occlusal caries in primary molar teeth.
    Teo TK; Ashley PF; Louca C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Apr; 18(3):737-44. PubMed ID: 23793456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Proximal caries lesion detection using the Canary Caries Detection System: an in vitro study.
    Jan J; Wan Bakar WZ; Mathews SM; Okoye LO; Ehler BR; Louden C; Amaechi BT
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2016 Nov; 7(4):383-390. PubMed ID: 26012784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Detection Methods for Early Caries Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Foros P; Oikonomou E; Koletsi D; Rahiotis C
    Caries Res; 2021; 55(4):247-259. PubMed ID: 34130279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Impact of different detection criteria on caries estimates and risk assessment.
    Alves LS; Susin C; Damé-Teixeira N; Maltz M
    Int Dent J; 2018 Jun; 68(3):144-151. PubMed ID: 29313946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The caries assessment spectrum and treatment (CAST) instrument: its reproducibility in clinical studies.
    de Souza AL; Bronkhorst EM; Creugers NH; Leal SC; Frencken JE
    Int Dent J; 2014 Aug; 64(4):187-94. PubMed ID: 24506822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for occlusal caries detection.
    Diniz MB; Rodrigues JA; Hug I; Cordeiro Rde C; Lussi A
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 37(5):399-404. PubMed ID: 19681984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. What is the most accurate method for detecting caries lesions? A systematic review.
    Gimenez T; Tedesco TK; Janoian F; Braga MM; Raggio DP; Deery C; Ricketts DNJ; Ekstrand KR; Mendes FM
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2021 Jun; 49(3):216-224. PubMed ID: 33847007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. How different do visuo-tactile criteria assess caries lesions activity status on occlusal surfaces?
    Floriano I; Bonini GC; Matos R; Novaes TF; Ekstrand KR; Mendes FM; Braga MM
    Oral Dis; 2015 Apr; 21(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 24912618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Performance of laser fluorescence devices, visual and radiographic examination for the detection of occlusal caries in primary molars.
    Neuhaus KW; Rodrigues JA; Hug I; Stich H; Lussi A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 20505963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth using swept source optical coherence tomography.
    Nakajima Y; Shimada Y; Sadr A; Wada I; Miyashin M; Takagi Y; Tagami J; Sumi Y
    J Biomed Opt; 2014 Jan; 19(1):16020. PubMed ID: 24474506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Influence of the discomfort reported by children on the performance of approximal caries detection methods.
    Novaes TF; Matos R; Raggio DP; Imparato JC; Braga MM; Mendes FM
    Caries Res; 2010; 44(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 20861630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Detection of Caries Around Amalgam Restorations on Approximal Surfaces.
    Diniz MB; Cordeiro RC; Ferreira-Zandona AG
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 26237637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Performance of fluorescence methods, radiographic examination and ICDAS II on occlusal surfaces in vitro.
    Rodrigues JA; Hug I; Diniz MB; Lussi A
    Caries Res; 2008; 42(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 18663299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Impact of Magnifying Loupes on Interexaminer Agreement in the Detection of Noncavitated Occlusal Carious Lesions.
    Khalaf ME; Qudeimat M; Alomari QD; Al-Tarakmeh Y; Honkala E
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2018; 16(4):375-380. PubMed ID: 30175336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Comparing potential early caries assessment methods for teledentistry.
    Van Hilsen Z; Jones RS
    BMC Oral Health; 2013 Mar; 13():16. PubMed ID: 23537067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. In vitro performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and bitewing radiographs for approximal caries detection in permanent and primary teeth.
    de Souza JF; Diniz MB; Boldieri T; Rodrigues JA; Lussi A; de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25728100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Impact of Different Illumination Conditions on Visual Caries Detection with ICDAS.
    Neuhaus KW; Jasarevic E; Lussi A
    Caries Res; 2015; 49(6):633-6. PubMed ID: 26655647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Visual-tactile versus radiographic caries detection agreement in caries-active adults.
    Ritter AV; Ramos MD; Astorga F; Shugars DA; Bader JD
    J Public Health Dent; 2013; 73(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 23772747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Performance of conventional and new methods for the detection of occlusal caries in deciduous teeth.
    Lussi A; Francescut P
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 12566632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A new approach to reliability assessment of dental caries examinations.
    Altarakemah Y; Al-Sane M; Lim S; Kingman A; Ismail AI
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 41(4):309-16. PubMed ID: 23278284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.