577 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24090701)
1. Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance.
Teubner W; Mehling A; Schuster PX; Guth K; Worth A; Burton J; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):468-85. PubMed ID: 24090701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of reactivity schemes for the prediction skin sensitization potential.
Patlewicz G; Roberts DW; Uriarte E
Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 21(2):521-41. PubMed ID: 18189364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S
J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of in silico tools to predict the skin sensitization potential of chemicals.
Verheyen GR; Braeken E; Van Deun K; Van Miert S
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 Jan; 28(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 28105856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reconstructed human epidermis-based testing strategy of skin sensitization potential and potency classification using epidermal sensitization assay and in silico data.
Mizumachi H; Suzuki S; Sakuma M; Natsui M; Imai N; Miyazawa M
J Appl Toxicol; 2024 Mar; 44(3):415-427. PubMed ID: 37846211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A quantitative in silico model for predicting skin sensitization using a nearest neighbours approach within expert-derived structure-activity alert spaces.
Canipa SJ; Chilton ML; Hemingway R; Macmillan DS; Myden A; Plante JP; Tennant RE; Vessey JD; Steger-Hartmann T; Gould J; Hillegass J; Etter S; Smith BPC; White A; Sterchele P; De Smedt A; O'Brien D; Parakhia R
J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Aug; 37(8):985-995. PubMed ID: 28244128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. TIMES-SS--a promising tool for the assessment of skin sensitization hazard. A characterization with respect to the OECD validation principles for (Q)SARs and an external evaluation for predictivity.
Patlewicz G; Dimitrov SD; Low LK; Kern PS; Dimitrova GD; Comber MI; Aptula AO; Phillips RD; Niemelä J; Madsen C; Wedebye EB; Roberts DW; Bailey PT; Mekenyan OG
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 48(2):225-39. PubMed ID: 17467128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structure-activity models for contact sensitization.
Fedorowicz A; Singh H; Soderholm S; Demchuk E
Chem Res Toxicol; 2005 Jun; 18(6):954-69. PubMed ID: 15962930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative and mechanistic read across for predicting the skin sensitization potential of alkenes acting via Michael addition.
Enoch SJ; Cronin MT; Schultz TW; Madden JC
Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 21(2):513-20. PubMed ID: 18189367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.
Schneider K; Akkan Z
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 39(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15135206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Filling the concept with data: integrating data from different in vitro and in silico assays on skin sensitizers to explore the battery approach for animal-free skin sensitization testing.
Natsch A; Emter R; Ellis G
Toxicol Sci; 2009 Jan; 107(1):106-21. PubMed ID: 18832184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian integrated testing strategy (ITS) for skin sensitization potency assessment: a decision support system for quantitative weight of evidence and adaptive testing strategy.
Jaworska JS; Natsch A; Ryan C; Strickland J; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
Arch Toxicol; 2015 Dec; 89(12):2355-83. PubMed ID: 26612363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation and improvement of QSAR predictions of skin sensitization for pesticides.
Braeuning C; Braeuning A; Mielke H; Holzwarth A; Peiser M
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2018 Oct; 29(10):823-846. PubMed ID: 30251555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of in silico models for the identification of respiratory sensitizers.
Dik S; Ezendam J; Cunningham AR; Carrasquer CA; van Loveren H; Rorije E
Toxicol Sci; 2014 Dec; 142(2):385-94. PubMed ID: 25239631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of skin sensitization potency of chemicals by human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) and an attempt at classifying skin sensitization potency.
Nukada Y; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M; Hirota M; Sakaguchi H; Sasa H; Nishiyama N
Toxicol In Vitro; 2012 Oct; 26(7):1150-60. PubMed ID: 22796097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro method for detecting chemical sensitization using human reconstructed skin models and its applicability to cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and medical device safety testing.
McKim JM; Keller DJ; Gorski JR
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2012 Dec; 31(4):292-305. PubMed ID: 22494060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structure-activity relationships for skin sensitization: recent improvements to Derek for Windows.
Langton K; Patlewicz GY; Long A; Marchant CA; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Dec; 55(6):342-7. PubMed ID: 17101009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of IATA - A case study in evaluating the global and local performance of a Bayesian network model for skin sensitization.
Fitzpatrick JM; Patlewicz G
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 28(4):297-310. PubMed ID: 28423913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Allergic contact dermatitis--formation, structural requirements, and reactivity of skin sensitizers.
Karlberg AT; Bergström MA; Börje A; Luthman K; Nilsson JL
Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Jan; 21(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 18052130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials.
Bauch C; Kolle SN; Ramirez T; Eltze T; Fabian E; Mehling A; Teubner W; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Aug; 63(3):489-504. PubMed ID: 22659254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
