These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24090954)

  • 1. Measuring contrast sensitivity using the M&S Smart System II versus the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Chandrakumar M; Colpa L; Reginald YA; Goltz HC; Wong AM
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Oct; 120(10):2160-1.e1. PubMed ID: 24090954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.
    Thayaparan K; Crossland MD; Rubin GS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 91(6):749-52. PubMed ID: 17166891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in Zaire.
    Kaimbo Wa Kaimbo D; Spileers W; Missotten L
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1996; 263():87-90. PubMed ID: 9396193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reliability of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart.
    Elliott DB; Sanderson K; Conkey A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Jan; 10(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 2330208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The letter contrast sensitivity test: clinical evaluation of a new design.
    Haymes SA; Roberts KF; Cruess AF; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Ramsey MS; Chauhan BC; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 47(6):2739-45. PubMed ID: 16723494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical contrast sensitivity chart evaluation.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jul; 12(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 1454362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Value of Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart for evaluation of visual system in multiple sclerosis patients.
    Wender M
    Neurol Neurochir Pol; 2007; 41(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 17530576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D; Bonette L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Oct; 10(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 2263364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Converting LEA to Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity score in neuro-ophthalmology patients.
    Prihatningtias R; Hardiyanti D; Valencia L
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 72(Suppl 3):S505-S508. PubMed ID: 38648459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of the Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test.
    Dougherty BE; Flom RE; Bullimore MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):970-5. PubMed ID: 16317373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the design of the letter contrast sensitivity test.
    Arditi A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 46(6):2225-9. PubMed ID: 15914645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Assessment of mesopic and contrast vision for driving licences: which cut-off values, which methods are appropriate?].
    Wilhelm H; Peters T; Durst W; Roelcke S; Quast R; Hütten M; Wilhelm B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2013 Nov; 230(11):1106-13. PubMed ID: 24190829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How accurate is an LCD screen version of the Pelli-Robson test?
    Zeri F; Calcatelli P; Funaro E; Martelli M; Naroo SA
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1473-1484. PubMed ID: 28639086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of an iPad test of letter contrast sensitivity.
    Kollbaum PS; Jansen ME; Kollbaum EJ; Bullimore MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 91(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 24413274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normal values for the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test.
    Mäntyjärvi M; Laitinen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2001 Feb; 27(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 11226793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the reliability, discriminative ability, and validity of disability glare tests.
    Elliott DB; Bullimore MA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Jan; 34(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 8425818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of different forms of monocular occlusion on measures of central visual function.
    Wildsoet C; Wood J; Maag H; Sabdia S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 May; 18(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 9829113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Edge contrast sensitivity in optometric practice: an assessment of its efficacy in detecting visual dysfunction.
    Grey CP; Yap M
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 Dec; 64(12):925-8. PubMed ID: 3445888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the CamBlobs2 contrast sensitivity test to the near Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in normally-sighted young adults.
    Rijal S; Cheng H; Marsack JD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Sep; 41(5):1125-1133. PubMed ID: 34418124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The validity of current clinical tests of contrast sensitivity and their ability to predict reading speed in low vision.
    Leat SJ; Woo GC
    Eye (Lond); 1997; 11 ( Pt 6)():893-9. PubMed ID: 9537154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.