BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24091264)

  • 21. A prospective randomized study of clinical outcomes in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy treated with open-door or French-door laminoplasty.
    Okada M; Minamide A; Endo T; Yoshida M; Kawakami M; Ando M; Hashizume H; Nakagawa Y; Maio K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(11):1119-26. PubMed ID: 19444058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Comparative study on microplate and anchor fixation in open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty].
    Zeng Y; Xiong M; Yu H; He N; Wang Z; Liu Z; Han H; Chen S
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 25(8):946-50. PubMed ID: 21923022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. A comparison of laminectomy and laminoplasty at five year average follow-up.
    Kaminsky SB; Clark CR; Traynelis VC
    Iowa Orthop J; 2004; 24():95-105. PubMed ID: 15296214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Treatment of fluorosis cervical canal stenosis by open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty using anchor fixation].
    Xia Y; Wan J; Yu B; Zhang X; Tian R
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Oct; 23(10):1204-8. PubMed ID: 19957840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ten-Year Long-term Results of Modified Cervical Double-door Laminoplasty With C3 Laminectomy Preserving the Semispinalis Cervicis Inserted Into the Axis Compared With Those of Conventional Cervical Laminoplasty.
    Kudo H; Takeuchi K; Wada K; Kumagai G; Tanaka S; Asari T; Araki R; Yokoyama T; Ishibashi Y
    Clin Spine Surg; 2021 Apr; 34(3):E147-E153. PubMed ID: 32941312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can elderly patients recover adequately after laminoplasty?: a comparative study of 520 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Machino M; Yukawa Y; Hida T; Ito K; Nakashima H; Kanbara S; Morita D; Kato F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(8):667-71. PubMed ID: 21912325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patient satisfaction with double-door laminoplasty for cervical compression myelopathy.
    Ohya J; Oshima Y; Takeshita K; Oka H; Chikuda H; Taniguchi Y; Matsubayashi Y; Tanaka S
    J Orthop Sci; 2015 Jan; 20(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 25355662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy: a cost and outcome comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and lateral mass fusion.
    Highsmith JM; Dhall SS; Haid RW; Rodts GE; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 21388285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Laminoplasty and skip laminectomy for cervical compressive myelopathy: range of motion, postoperative neck pain, and surgical outcomes in a randomized prospective study.
    Yukawa Y; Kato F; Ito K; Horie Y; Hida T; Ito Z; Matsuyama Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(18):1980-5. PubMed ID: 17700444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Analysis of clinical efficacy of unilateral open-door cervical laminoplasty combined with foraminotomy for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament].
    Yang F; Tan MS; Tang XS; Jiang LH; Yi P; Hao QY
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2018 Apr; 31(4):333-338. PubMed ID: 29772859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Clinical validity of hinge position to expansive semi open-door laminoplasty].
    Xia YP; Zhang XL; Li HN; Song HF
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 48(16):1229-33. PubMed ID: 21055212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Combined posterior and anterior approaches for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy].
    Liu ZZ; Zhang J; Guo YX; Tian WM; Wang Y
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2010 Jul; 23(7):507-10. PubMed ID: 20701123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Analysis of the long-term outcome of anterior approach surgery on cervical spondylotic myelopathy].
    Lu KW; Jin DD; Wang J; Chen JT; Wang JX; Jiang JM; Qu DB
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 44(16):1091-3. PubMed ID: 17081461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Results of surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients aged 75 years or more: a comparative study of operative methods.
    Kanchiku T; Imajo Y; Suzuki H; Yoshida Y; Nishida N; Taguchi T
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Aug; 134(8):1045-50. PubMed ID: 24880218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Clinical analysis of C5 nerve root palsy in hinge side and different angles in lamina open-door after expansion of open-door cervical laminoplasty].
    Sun T; Zhang H; Lu S; Li H; Yu B; Zhang X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 25(11):1285-9. PubMed ID: 22229177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long-term results after expansive open-door laminoplasty for the segmental-type of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: a comparison with nonsegmental-type lesions.
    Ogawa Y; Chiba K; Matsumoto M; Nakamura M; Takaishi H; Hirabayashi H; Hirabayashi K; Nishiwaki Y; Toyama Y
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Sep; 3(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 16235702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of deep extensor muscle-preserving approach on clinical outcome of laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparative cohort study.
    Kotani Y; Abumi K; Ito M; Sudo H; Takahata M; Nagahama K; Iwata A; Minami A
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Aug; 21(8):1536-44. PubMed ID: 22441562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study with minimum 5-year follow-up data.
    Hyun SJ; Riew KD; Rhim SC
    Spine J; 2013 Apr; 13(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 23218824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Preservation of the spinous process-ligament-muscle complex to prevent kyphotic deformity following laminoplasty.
    Liu J; Ebraheim NA; Sanford CG; Patil V; Haman SP; Ren L; Yang H
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 17321964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty.
    Masaki Y; Yamazaki M; Okawa A; Aramomi M; Hashimoto M; Koda M; Mochizuki M; Moriya H
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 17285045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.