508 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24091489)
1. Economic analysis and review of the literature on implant-based breast reconstruction with and without the use of the acellular dermal matrix.
Bank J; Phillips NA; Park JE; Song DH
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Dec; 37(6):1194-201. PubMed ID: 24091489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does acellular dermal matrix really improve aesthetic outcome in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction?
Ibrahim AM; Koolen PG; Ganor O; Markarian MK; Tobias AM; Lee BT; Lin SJ; Mureau MA
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Jun; 39(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 25894022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The cost effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant immediate breast reconstruction.
Krishnan NM; Chatterjee A; Rosenkranz KM; Powell SG; Nigriny JF; Vidal DC
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Apr; 67(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 24508194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost analysis of implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix.
de Blacam C; Momoh AO; Colakoglu S; Slavin SA; Tobias AM; Lee BT
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Nov; 69(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 21587037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcome of the use of acellular-dermal matrix to assist implant-based breast reconstruction in a single centre.
Barber MD; Williams L; Anderson ED; Neades GT; Raine C; Young O; Kulkarni D; Young I; Dixon JM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 25238954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of irradiated expanders: protective lipofilling allows immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction in the setting of postoperative radiotherapy.
Ribuffo D; Atzeni M; Guerra M; Bucher S; Politi C; Deidda M; Atzori F; Dessi M; Madeddu C; Lay G
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Dec; 37(6):1146-52. PubMed ID: 24114295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost analysis of postmastectomy reconstruction: A comparison of two staged implant reconstruction using tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix with abdominal-based perforator free flaps.
Tran BNN; Fadayomi A; Lin SJ; Singhal D; Lee BT
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):439-447. PubMed ID: 28591940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison study of two types of expander-based breast reconstruction: acellular dermal matrix-assisted versus total submuscular placement.
Hanna KR; DeGeorge BR; Mericli AF; Lin KY; Drake DB
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jan; 70(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 21862915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The partial AlloDerm sling: reducing allograft costs associated with breast reconstruction.
Chepla KJ; Dagget JR; Soltanian HT
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Jul; 65(7):924-30. PubMed ID: 22406261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Classification and management of seromas in immediate breast reconstruction using the tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix technique.
Brzezienski MA; Jarrell JA; Mooty RC
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 May; 70(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 23542848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of Partial- Versus Full-Sling Acellular Dermal Matrix Use in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Head-to-Head Comparison.
Lee KT; Eom Y; Mun GH; Bang SI; Jeon BJ; Pyon JK
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Apr; 42(2):422-433. PubMed ID: 29368031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Meta-analysis of Postoperative Complications of Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction Using Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Zhao X; Wu X; Dong J; Liu Y; Zheng L; Zhang L
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 39(6):892-901. PubMed ID: 26377821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One-stage breast reconstruction using the inferior dermal flap, implant, and free nipple graft.
King IC; Harvey JR; Bhaskar P
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2014 Apr; 38(2):358-64. PubMed ID: 24477522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.
Lanier ST; Wang ED; Chen JJ; Arora BP; Katz SM; Gelfand MA; Khan SU; Dagum AB; Bui DT
Ann Plast Surg; 2010 May; 64(5):674-8. PubMed ID: 20395795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction Patients Using a Sterile Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft.
Ortiz JA
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2017 Jun; 41(3):542-550. PubMed ID: 28280894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A 3D Mammometric Comparison of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction With and Without Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM).
Tsay C; Zhu V; Sturrock T; Shah A; Kwei S
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Feb; 42(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28916881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of resource utilisation of single stage porcine acellular dermal matrix assisted breast reconstruction: A comparative study.
Kilchenmann AJ; Lardi AM; Ho-Asjoe M; Junge K; Farhadi J
Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):876-82. PubMed ID: 25311295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative Analysis of Sterile Freeze-Dried Versus Sterile Pre-Hydration Acellular Dermal Matrix in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Park KC; Park ES; Cha HG; Kim SY
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Oct; 47(5):1671-1677. PubMed ID: 33959782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Multi Centre Canadian Acellular Dermal Matrix Trial (MCCAT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in implant-based breast reconstruction.
Zhong T; Temple-Oberle C; Hofer SO; Beber B; Semple J; Brown M; Macadam S; Lennox P; Panzarella T; McCarthy C; Baxter N;
Trials; 2013 Oct; 14():356. PubMed ID: 24165392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
Negenborn VL; Smit JM; Dikmans REG; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Br J Surg; 2019 Apr; 106(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 30835827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
