These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24092726)

  • 1. The seer of science publishing.
    Rabesandratana T
    Science; 2013 Oct; 342(6154):66-7. PubMed ID: 24092726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Open access will mean peer review will become "the job of the many, not the select few".
    Short R
    BMJ; 2007 Feb; 334(7589):330. PubMed ID: 17303851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fair-use policies aim to balance access and cost of publishing.
    Dylla HF
    Nature; 2009 Jun; 459(7247):641. PubMed ID: 19494896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Open access musings.
    Nazaroff WW
    Indoor Air; 2012 Aug; 22(4):263-5. PubMed ID: 22775514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review.
    Hershey DR
    Nature; 1989 Aug; 340(6233):424. PubMed ID: 2755503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Open access publishing: a boon for scientific community.
    Aqil M
    Med Sci Monit; 2004 May; 10(5):LE5. PubMed ID: 15114277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Science hoax: poor journalology reflects poor training in peer review.
    Kumar R
    BMJ; 2013 Dec; 347():f7465. PubMed ID: 24336454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can journals influence science?
    Maddox J
    Nature; 1989 Jun; 339(6227):657. PubMed ID: 2739710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NECOBELAC supporting Open Access, a path to open science.
    Rev Salud Publica (Bogota); 2011 Dec; 13(6):881-2. PubMed ID: 22634990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reviewing refereeing.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2011 Feb; 13(2):109. PubMed ID: 21283117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Science communication: Self-publishing's benefits.
    Burdett AN
    Science; 2013 Dec; 342(6163):1169-70. PubMed ID: 24311664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perfecting peer review?
    Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review time: how late is late in a small medical journal?
    Kljaković-Gaspić M; Hren D; Marusić A; Marusić M
    Arch Med Res; 2003; 34(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 14602513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring new frontiers of electronic publishing in biomedical science.
    Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Mar; 50(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 19352562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When science and politics don't mix.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5574):1765. PubMed ID: 12052922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The many challenges of open access.
    Blow NS
    Biotechniques; 2011 Nov; 51(5):291. PubMed ID: 22054538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The downside of open-access publishing.
    Haug C
    N Engl J Med; 2013 Feb; 368(9):791-3. PubMed ID: 23445091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Open access in medical publishing: trends and countertrends.
    CMAJ; 2005 Jan; 172(2):149, 151. PubMed ID: 15655217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Affirming science and peer-review publishing.
    Talley CR
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2009 May; 66(10):896. PubMed ID: 19420307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Science publishing and security concerns.
    Falkow S
    Science; 2003 May; 300(5620):737-9; author reply 737-9. PubMed ID: 12730579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.