These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24092736)

  • 21. Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review.
    Severin A; Egger M; Eve MP; Hürlimann D
    F1000Res; 2018; 7():1925. PubMed ID: 32399178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The publication process itself was the major cause of publication bias in genetic epidemiology.
    Calnan M; Smith GD; Sterne JA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 59(12):1312-8. PubMed ID: 17098574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of research in India - are we doing it right?
    Madhan M; Gunasekaran S; Arunachalam S
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2018; 3(3):221-229. PubMed ID: 29650499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Case vignette: inside information.
    Kobrick FR; Rodwin MA; VandenBos GR
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):135-47. PubMed ID: 11653081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Disseminating research and scholarly projects: developing a successful abstract.
    Linder L
    J Pediatr Oncol Nurs; 2012; 29(6):362-6. PubMed ID: 22909779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Emerging infectious disease and fast-track publication: when public health gets priority over the formality of scholarly publishing.
    Pirmez C; Brandão AA; Momen H
    Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz; 2016 May; 111(5):285. PubMed ID: 27223865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Manuscript peer review: a guide for advanced practice nurses.
    Christenbery TL
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2011 Jan; 23(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 21208330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can scientists and policy makers work together?
    Choi BC; Pang T; Lin V; Puska P; Sherman G; Goddard M; Ackland MJ; Sainsbury P; Stachenko S; Morrison H; Clottey C
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Aug; 59(8):632-7. PubMed ID: 16020638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ten simple rules for effective online outreach.
    Bik HM; Dove AD; Goldstein MC; Helm RR; MacPherson R; Martini K; Warneke A; McClain C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Apr; 11(4):e1003906. PubMed ID: 25879439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry.
    Blumenthal D; Campbell EG; Causino N; Louis KS
    N Engl J Med; 1996 Dec; 335(23):1734-9. PubMed ID: 8929266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Conflicts of interest in medical science: peer usage, peer review and 'CoI consultancy'.
    Charlton BG
    Med Hypotheses; 2004; 63(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15236772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The downside of open-access publishing.
    Haug C
    N Engl J Med; 2013 Feb; 368(9):791-3. PubMed ID: 23445091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. From "our world" to the "real world": Exploring the views and behaviour of policy-influential Australian public health researchers.
    Haynes AS; Derrick GE; Chapman S; Redman S; Hall WD; Gillespie J; Sturk H
    Soc Sci Med; 2011 Apr; 72(7):1047-55. PubMed ID: 21414704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The utility of hybrid promotion and tenure tracks for dental school faculty.
    Costello BJ; Marshall KL; Schafer T; Phillips S; Hart TC
    J Dent Educ; 2013 Jun; 77(6):706-15. PubMed ID: 23740907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Scholarly publishing. Bill would require free public access to research papers.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2006 May; 312(5775):828. PubMed ID: 16690825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Celebrating Reviewers: your contribution to development of the discipline.
    Bryar R; Kendall S
    Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2012 Jul; 13(3):191-2. PubMed ID: 22781049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Suppression, bias, and selection in science: the case of cancer research.
    Hess DJ
    Account Res; 1999; 6(4):245-57. PubMed ID: 11657839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Time to rethink publish or perish.
    Liewehr FR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Jun; 99(6):653-4. PubMed ID: 15897847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Open access will mean peer review will become "the job of the many, not the select few".
    Short R
    BMJ; 2007 Feb; 334(7589):330. PubMed ID: 17303851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [An archivist in a laboratory].
    Kulecka A
    Kwart Hist Nauki Tech; 2000; 45(1):47-69. PubMed ID: 11625759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.