126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24093193)
1. Visual rehabilitation in patients with myopic maculopathy: our experience.
Vingolo EM; Salvatore S; Domanico D; Spadea L; Nebbioso M
Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):438-42. PubMed ID: 24093193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual rehabilitation using microperimetric acoustic biofeedback training in individuals with central scotoma.
Ratra D; Gopalakrishnan S; Dalan D; Ratra V; Damkondwar D; Laxmi G
Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):172-179. PubMed ID: 30253443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biofeedback stimulation in patients with age-related macular degeneration: comparison between 2 different methods.
Amore FM; Paliotta S; Silvestri V; Piscopo P; Turco S; Reibaldi A
Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 24093192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microperimetry biofeedback training in a patient with bilateral myopic macular degeneration with central scotoma.
Raman R; Damkondwar D; Neriyanuri S; Sharma T
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 63(6):534-6. PubMed ID: 26265646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of Low Vision Rehabilitation Using Microperimetric Acoustic Biofeedback Training in Patients with Central Scotoma.
Sahli E; Altinbay D; Bingol Kiziltunc P; Idil A
Curr Eye Res; 2021 May; 46(5):731-738. PubMed ID: 33073619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microperimetric biofeedback in AMD patients.
Vingolo EM; Cavarretta S; Domanico D; Parisi F; Malagola R
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2007 Dec; 32(3-4):185-9. PubMed ID: 17574525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of MP-3 microperimeter biofeedback fixation training for low vision rehabilitation in patients with maculopathy.
Qian T; Xu X; Liu X; Yen M; Zhou H; Mao M; Cai H; Shen H; Xu X; Gong Y; Yu S
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):197. PubMed ID: 35484529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Central retinal sensitivity after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab for myopic choroidal neovascularization.
Yodoi Y; Tsujikawa A; Nakanishi H; Otani A; Tamura H; Ojima Y; Hayashi H; Yoshimura N
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 147(5):816-24, 824.e1. PubMed ID: 19211092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low-vision rehabilitation by means of MP-1 biofeedback examination in patients with different macular diseases: a pilot study.
Vingolo EM; Salvatore S; Cavarretta S
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Jun; 34(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 19396541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-Dimensional Eye Shape, Myopic Maculopathy, and Visual Acuity: The Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center-Brien Holden Vision Institute High Myopia Cohort Study.
Guo X; Xiao O; Chen Y; Wu H; Chen L; Morgan IG; He M
Ophthalmology; 2017 May; 124(5):679-687. PubMed ID: 28237427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rehabilitative approach in patients with ring scotoma.
Amore FM; Silvestri V; Turco S; De Rossi F; Cruciani F
Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):420-6. PubMed ID: 24093190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term pattern of progression of myopic maculopathy: a natural history study.
Hayashi K; Ohno-Matsui K; Shimada N; Moriyama M; Kojima A; Hayashi W; Yasuzumi K; Nagaoka N; Saka N; Yoshida T; Tokoro T; Mochizuki M
Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1595-611, 1611.e1-4. PubMed ID: 20207005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of vision rehabilitation treatment through MP-1 microperimeter in patients with visual loss due to macular disease.
Pacella E; Pacella F; Mazzeo F; Turchetti P; Carlesimo SC; Cerutti F; Lenzi T; De Paolis G; Giorgi D
Clin Ter; 2012 Nov; 163(6):e423-8. PubMed ID: 23306757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New trends in visual rehabilitation with MP-1 microperimeter biofeedback: optic neural dysfunction.
Verboschi F; Domanico D; Nebbioso M; Corradetti G; Zaccaria Scalinci S; Vingolo EM
Funct Neurol; 2013; 28(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 24598397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF 23-GAUGE PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY WITH INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING AND GAS TAMPONADE FOR MYOPIC TRACTION MACULOPATHY: A Prospective Study.
Figueroa MS; Ruiz-Moreno JM; Gonzalez del Valle F; Govetto A; de la Vega C; Plascencia RN; Contreras I; Medina JL
Retina; 2015 Sep; 35(9):1836-43. PubMed ID: 25946689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anatomical and visual outcomes after episcleral macular buckling compared with those after pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment caused by macular hole in highly myopic eyes.
Ando F; Ohba N; Touura K; Hirose H
Retina; 2007 Jan; 27(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 17218913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Macular functional changes evaluated with MP-1 microperimetry after intravitreal bevacizumab for subfoveal myopic choroidal neovascularization: one-year results.
Scupola A; Tiberti AC; Sasso P; Savastano MC; Mastrocola A; Marangoni D; Minnella AM; Falsini B; Balestrazzi E
Retina; 2010 May; 30(5):739-47. PubMed ID: 20038860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Epiretinal membrane surgery outcomes in highly myopic eyes without traction maculopathy: long-term results of a case-control study.
El Sanharawi M; Sandali O; Bonnel S; Laroche L; Monin C
Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 156(2):319-325.e1. PubMed ID: 23668680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring retinal sensitivity with the microperimeter in patients with diabetes.
Nittala MG; Gella L; Raman R; Sharma T
Retina; 2012 Jul; 32(7):1302-9. PubMed ID: 22450513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The relationship between scotoma displacement and preferred retinal loci in low-vision patients with age-related macular degeneration.
Markowitz SN; Aleykina N
Can J Ophthalmol; 2010 Feb; 45(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 20130712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
