These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24093209)

  • 21. Scotoma and fixation patterns using scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry in patients with macular dystrophy.
    Mori F; Ishiko S; Kitaya N; Takamiya A; Sato E; Hikichi T; Yoshida A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Dec; 132(6):897-902. PubMed ID: 11730655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficacy of SLO-Microperimetry and Humphrey for evaluating macular sensitivity changes in advanced glaucoma.
    Kulkarni SV; Coupland SG; Stitt DM; Hamilton J; Brownstein JJ; Damji KF
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):406-12. PubMed ID: 24093188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preferred retinal locus profile during prolonged fixation attempts.
    Morales MU; Saker S; Mehta RL; Rubinstein M; Amoaku WM
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):368-74. PubMed ID: 24093182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scotoma displacement in the macular mapping test as a tool for identification of preferred retinal loci.
    Al-Serafi M; Markowitz SN; Reyes SV
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 47(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 22333854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fixation parameter test-retest repeatability of the worse eye in central field loss.
    Samet S; Tarita-Nistor L; González EG; Mandelcorn MS; Mandelcorn ED; Steinbach MJ
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 53(3):229-235. PubMed ID: 29784158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fixation behavior in advanced stage glaucoma assessed by the MicroPerimeter MP-1.
    Kameda T; Tanabe T; Hangai M; Ojima T; Aikawa H; Yoshimura N
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2009 Nov; 53(6):580-587. PubMed ID: 20020235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rehabilitation with MP1 biofeedback training of a posterior microphthalmos case.
    Toto L; Di Antonio L; Mastropasqua A; De Nicola C; Mastropasqua L
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):e107-11. PubMed ID: 24093198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Implementing and Monitoring At-Home Virtual Reality Oculo-kinetic Perimetry During COVID-19.
    Deiner MS; Damato BE; Ou Y
    Ophthalmology; 2020 Sep; 127(9):1258. PubMed ID: 32535062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Microperimetry in multiple evanescent white dot syndrome.
    Boscarino MA; Johnson TM
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 42(5):743-5. PubMed ID: 17823641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Combined use of SLO microperimetry and OCT for retinal functional and structural testing.
    Menke MN; Sato E; Van De Velde FJ; Feke GT
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 May; 244(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 16133024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Can positions in the visual field with high attentional capabilities be good candidates for a new preferred retinal locus?
    Barraza-Bernal MJ; Ivanov IV; Nill S; Rifai K; Trauzettel-Klosinski S; Wahl S
    Vision Res; 2017 Nov; 140():1-12. PubMed ID: 28778600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scotoma size reduction as an adaptive strategy in age-related macular degeneration.
    Lee KK; Markowitz SN
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2010 Aug; 45(4):393-8. PubMed ID: 20648088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Feasibility of Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) Microperimetry in Children: Sensitivity, Reliability, and Fixation Stability in Healthy Observers.
    Jones PR; Yasoubi N; Nardini M; Rubin GS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Nov; 57(14):6349-6359. PubMed ID: 27898980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical and microperimetric predictors of reading speed in low vision patients: a structural equation modeling approach.
    Giacomelli G; Virgili G; Giansanti F; Sato G; Cappello E; Cruciani F; Varano M; Menchini U
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jun; 54(6):4403-8. PubMed ID: 23722392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fixation characteristics among subjects with diabetes: SN-DREAMS II, Report No. 5.
    Gella L; Raman R; Pal SS; Ganesan S; Sharma T
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 50(4):302-9. PubMed ID: 26257225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Plotting visual fields using contralateral fixation: a novel honeycomb device.
    Almog Y; Shiftan A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 122(7):1052-6. PubMed ID: 15249374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Normal values for fundus perimetry with the microperimeter MP1.
    Midena E; Vujosevic S; Cavarzeran F;
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1571-6, 1576.e1. PubMed ID: 20472294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Characterization of field loss based on microperimetry is predictive of face recognition difficulties.
    Wallis TS; Taylor CP; Wallis J; Jackson ML; Bex PJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Jan; 55(1):142-53. PubMed ID: 24302589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Maximum reading speed and binocular summation in patients with central vision loss.
    Tarita-Nistor L; Brent MH; Markowitz SN; Steinbach MJ; González EG
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):443-9. PubMed ID: 24093194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inter-device comparison of retinal sensitivity measurements: the CenterVue MAIA and the Nidek MP-1.
    Wong EN; Mackey DA; Morgan WH; Chen FK
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016; 44(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 26285157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.