BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

543 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24093466)

  • 1. Endoscope-assisted spinal decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Minamide A; Yoshida M; Yamada H; Nakagawa Y; Kawai M; Maio K; Hashizume H; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Dec; 19(6):664-71. PubMed ID: 24093466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level.
    Komatsu J; Muta T; Nagura N; Iwabuchi M; Fukuda H; Kaneko K; Shirado O
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018782546. PubMed ID: 29938605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25840041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
    den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).
    Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy. A new endoscopic approach for spinal stenosis decompression.
    Soliman HM
    Spine J; 2015 Oct; 15(10):2282-9. PubMed ID: 26165475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative scoliosis: Predictive factors of radiographic and clinical outcomes.
    Minamide A; Yoshida M; Iwahashi H; Simpson AK; Yamada H; Hashizume H; Nakagawa Y; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S; Kagotani R; Sonekatsu M; Sasaki T; Shinto K; Deguchi T
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 May; 22(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 28161236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Pao JL; Chen WC; Chen PQ
    Eur Spine J; 2009 May; 18(5):672-8. PubMed ID: 19238459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis.
    Yagi M; Okada E; Ninomiya K; Kihara M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Apr; 10(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 19441985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
    Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
    Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive spinal decompression for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis maintains stability and may avoid the need for fusion.
    Minamide A; Yoshida M; Simpson AK; Nakagawa Y; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S; Takami M; Hashizume H; Yukawa Y; Yamada H
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Apr; 100-B(4):499-506. PubMed ID: 29629597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient outcomes for a minimally invasive approach to treat lumbar spinal canal stenosis: is microendoscopic or microscopic decompressive laminotomy the less invasive surgery?
    Fujimoto T; Taniwaki T; Tahata S; Nakamura T; Mizuta H
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Apr; 131():21-5. PubMed ID: 25666763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
    Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.
    Thomé C; Zevgaridis D; Leheta O; Bäzner H; Pöckler-Schöniger C; Wöhrle J; Schmiedek P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Aug; 3(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 16370302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Split-spinous process laminotomy and discectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary report.
    Cho DY; Lin HL; Lee WY; Lee HC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Mar; 6(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 17355022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microendoscopy-assisted muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical results of consecutive 105 cases with more than 3-year follow-up.
    Yoshimoto M; Miyakawa T; Takebayashi T; Ida K; Tanimoto K; Kawamura S; Yamashita T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):E318-25. PubMed ID: 24365896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modified unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: technical note.
    Liu X; Yuan S; Tian Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(12):E732-7. PubMed ID: 23466507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.