215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24093823)
1. Experimental evidence for asymmetric mate preference and aggression: behavioral interactions in a woodrat (Neotoma) hybrid zone.
Shurtliff QR; Murphy PJ; Yeiter JD; Matocq MD
BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 13():220. PubMed ID: 24093823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. REINFORCEMENT OF STICKLEBACK MATE PREFERENCES: SYMPATRY BREEDS CONTEMPT.
Rundle HD; Schluter D
Evolution; 1998 Feb; 52(1):200-208. PubMed ID: 28568163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproductive character displacement of male stickleback mate preference: reinforcement or direct selection?
Albert AY; Schluter D
Evolution; 2004 May; 58(5):1099-107. PubMed ID: 15212390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reinforcement shapes clines in female mate discrimination in Drosophila subquinaria.
Bewick ER; Dyer KA
Evolution; 2014 Nov; 68(11):3082-94. PubMed ID: 25163510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Male courtship preferences demonstrate discrimination against allopatric colour morphs in a cichlid fish.
Zoppoth P; Koblmüller S; Sefc KM
J Evol Biol; 2013 Mar; 26(3):577-86. PubMed ID: 23405907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The evolution of male and female mating preferences in Drosophila speciation.
Yukilevich R; Peterson EK
Evolution; 2019 Sep; 73(9):1759-1773. PubMed ID: 31077339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Behavioral Isolation due to Cascade Reinforcement in Lucania Killifish.
Kozak GM; Roland G; Rankhorn C; Falater A; Berdan EL; Fuller RC
Am Nat; 2015 Apr; 185(4):491-506. PubMed ID: 25811084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interspecific interactions and learning variability jointly drive geographic differences in mate preferences.
Verzijden MN; Svensson EI
Evolution; 2016 Aug; 70(8):1896-903. PubMed ID: 27302691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Asymmetric reinforcement in
St John ME; Fuller RC
Curr Zool; 2021 Apr; 67(2):215-224. PubMed ID: 33854539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive character displacement of female mate preferences for male cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila subquinaria.
Rundle HD; Dyer KA
Evolution; 2015 Oct; 69(10):2625-37. PubMed ID: 26299584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Why do males choose heterospecific females in the red spider mite?
Sato Y; Staudacher H; Sabelis MW
Exp Appl Acarol; 2016 Jan; 68(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 26530994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Male mate preference and size-assortative mating in convict cichlids: A role for female aggression?
Bloch AN; Estela VJ; Leese JM; Itzkowitz M
Behav Processes; 2016 Sep; 130():81-5. PubMed ID: 27444247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in dietary composition and preference maintained despite gene flow across a woodrat hybrid zone.
Nielsen DP; Matocq MD
Ecol Evol; 2021 May; 11(9):4909-4919. PubMed ID: 33976858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproductive Costs for Hybridizing Female Anasa tristis (Hemiptera: Coreidae), but No Evidence of Selection Against Interspecific Mating.
Hamel JA; Eskeland EE; Lehmann TK; Stover PL
J Insect Sci; 2018 Jul; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 30165456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolution of choosiness dictates whether search costs of mate choice enhance speciation by sexual selection.
Yukilevich R; Aoki F
J Evol Biol; 2022 Aug; 35(8):1045-1059. PubMed ID: 35830473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Barriers to gene exchange in hybridizing field crickets: the role of male courtship effort and cuticular hydrocarbons.
Maroja LS; McKenzie ZM; Hart E; Jing J; Larson EL; Richardson DP
BMC Evol Biol; 2014 Mar; 14(1):65. PubMed ID: 24678642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The search for causal traits of speciation: Divergent female mate preferences target male courtship song, not pheromones, in Drosophila athabasca species complex.
Yukilevich R; Harvey T; Nguyen S; Kehlbeck J; Park A
Evolution; 2016 Mar; 70(3):526-42. PubMed ID: 26831347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Female Choice or Male Sex Drive? The Advantages of Male Body Size during Mating in Drosophila Melanogaster.
Jagadeeshan S; Shah U; Chakrabarti D; Singh RS
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144672. PubMed ID: 26658421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. You can't always get what you want: size assortative mating by mutual mate choice as a resolution of sexual conflict.
Baldauf SA; Kullmann H; Schroth SH; Thünken T; Bakker TC
BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Jun; 9():129. PubMed ID: 19515244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
