These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24093823)

  • 1. Experimental evidence for asymmetric mate preference and aggression: behavioral interactions in a woodrat (Neotoma) hybrid zone.
    Shurtliff QR; Murphy PJ; Yeiter JD; Matocq MD
    BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 13():220. PubMed ID: 24093823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. REINFORCEMENT OF STICKLEBACK MATE PREFERENCES: SYMPATRY BREEDS CONTEMPT.
    Rundle HD; Schluter D
    Evolution; 1998 Feb; 52(1):200-208. PubMed ID: 28568163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproductive character displacement of male stickleback mate preference: reinforcement or direct selection?
    Albert AY; Schluter D
    Evolution; 2004 May; 58(5):1099-107. PubMed ID: 15212390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Male courtship preferences demonstrate discrimination against allopatric colour morphs in a cichlid fish.
    Zoppoth P; Koblmüller S; Sefc KM
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Mar; 26(3):577-86. PubMed ID: 23405907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reinforcement shapes clines in female mate discrimination in Drosophila subquinaria.
    Bewick ER; Dyer KA
    Evolution; 2014 Nov; 68(11):3082-94. PubMed ID: 25163510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The evolution of male and female mating preferences in Drosophila speciation.
    Yukilevich R; Peterson EK
    Evolution; 2019 Sep; 73(9):1759-1773. PubMed ID: 31077339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Behavioral Isolation due to Cascade Reinforcement in Lucania Killifish.
    Kozak GM; Roland G; Rankhorn C; Falater A; Berdan EL; Fuller RC
    Am Nat; 2015 Apr; 185(4):491-506. PubMed ID: 25811084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interspecific interactions and learning variability jointly drive geographic differences in mate preferences.
    Verzijden MN; Svensson EI
    Evolution; 2016 Aug; 70(8):1896-903. PubMed ID: 27302691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Asymmetric reinforcement in
    St John ME; Fuller RC
    Curr Zool; 2021 Apr; 67(2):215-224. PubMed ID: 33854539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproductive character displacement of female mate preferences for male cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila subquinaria.
    Rundle HD; Dyer KA
    Evolution; 2015 Oct; 69(10):2625-37. PubMed ID: 26299584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why do males choose heterospecific females in the red spider mite?
    Sato Y; Staudacher H; Sabelis MW
    Exp Appl Acarol; 2016 Jan; 68(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 26530994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Male mate preference and size-assortative mating in convict cichlids: A role for female aggression?
    Bloch AN; Estela VJ; Leese JM; Itzkowitz M
    Behav Processes; 2016 Sep; 130():81-5. PubMed ID: 27444247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in dietary composition and preference maintained despite gene flow across a woodrat hybrid zone.
    Nielsen DP; Matocq MD
    Ecol Evol; 2021 May; 11(9):4909-4919. PubMed ID: 33976858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproductive Costs for Hybridizing Female Anasa tristis (Hemiptera: Coreidae), but No Evidence of Selection Against Interspecific Mating.
    Hamel JA; Eskeland EE; Lehmann TK; Stover PL
    J Insect Sci; 2018 Jul; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 30165456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolution of choosiness dictates whether search costs of mate choice enhance speciation by sexual selection.
    Yukilevich R; Aoki F
    J Evol Biol; 2022 Aug; 35(8):1045-1059. PubMed ID: 35830473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Barriers to gene exchange in hybridizing field crickets: the role of male courtship effort and cuticular hydrocarbons.
    Maroja LS; McKenzie ZM; Hart E; Jing J; Larson EL; Richardson DP
    BMC Evol Biol; 2014 Mar; 14(1):65. PubMed ID: 24678642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The search for causal traits of speciation: Divergent female mate preferences target male courtship song, not pheromones, in Drosophila athabasca species complex.
    Yukilevich R; Harvey T; Nguyen S; Kehlbeck J; Park A
    Evolution; 2016 Mar; 70(3):526-42. PubMed ID: 26831347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative analysis reveals assortative mate preferences in darters independent of sympatry and sex.
    Héjja-Brichard Y; Renoult JP; Mendelson TC
    Ecol Evol; 2024 Oct; 14(10):e11498. PubMed ID: 39355117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. You can't always get what you want: size assortative mating by mutual mate choice as a resolution of sexual conflict.
    Baldauf SA; Kullmann H; Schroth SH; Thünken T; Bakker TC
    BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Jun; 9():129. PubMed ID: 19515244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Female Choice or Male Sex Drive? The Advantages of Male Body Size during Mating in Drosophila Melanogaster.
    Jagadeeshan S; Shah U; Chakrabarti D; Singh RS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144672. PubMed ID: 26658421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.