These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24094014)

  • 1. Transverse maxillary and mandibular growth during and after bionator therapy: study with metallic implants.
    Monini Ada C; Júnior LG; Maia LG; Pinto Ados S
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(3):72-9. PubMed ID: 24094014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transverse skeletal base adaptations with Bionator therapy: a pilot implant study.
    Marotta Araujo A; Buschang PH; Melo AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):666-71. PubMed ID: 15592213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term effectiveness and treatment timing for Bionator therapy.
    Faltin KJ; Faltin RM; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Ghiozzi B; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 12828429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment effects of headgear biteplane and bionator appliances.
    Almeida-Pedrin RR; Almeida MR; Almeida RR; Pinzan A; Ferreira FP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 17693369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment effects produced by the Bionator appliance. Comparison with an untreated Class II sample.
    Almeida MR; Henriques JF; Almeida RR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Ursi W
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 14994884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative assessment of two-phase class II treatment with Activator or Bionator followed by fixed appliances: A retrospective controlled before-and-after study.
    Abbing A; Koretsi V; Kalavritinos M; Schröder T; Eliades T; Papageorgiou SN
    Int Orthod; 2024 Jun; 22(2):100863. PubMed ID: 38428369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clarifying the mechanism of effect of the Bionator for treatment of maxillary protrusion: A percentile growth study.
    Oda H; Sandou M; Lin CM; Kamata M; Kawata T
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):213-219. PubMed ID: 27759410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive condylar growth and mandibular remodelling changes with bionator therapy--an implant study.
    Araujo AM; Buschang PH; Melo AC
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Oct; 26(5):515-22. PubMed ID: 15536840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mandibular growth and dentoalveolar development in the treatment of class II, division 1, malocclusion using Balters Bionator according to the skeletal maturation.
    dos Santos-Pinto PR; Martins LP; dos Santos-Pinto A; Gandini Júnior LG; Raveli DB; dos Santos-Pinto CC
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(4):43-52. PubMed ID: 24262416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Prospective Study Comparing Adolescent and Post-Adolescent Periods Regarding Effects of Activator Appliance in Patients with Class II Mandibular Retrognathia by Using 3dMDface Analysis and Cephalometry.
    Yüksel Coşkun E; Esenlik E
    Med Sci Monit; 2020 Jun; 26():e921401. PubMed ID: 32588836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term effects of the Forsus Device in Class II division I patients treated at pre-peak, peak, and post-peak growth periods: A retrospective study.
    Alhoraibi L; Alvetro L; Al-Jewair T
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):451-460. PubMed ID: 32778390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance.
    Pancherz H; Fackel U
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 2351206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes induced by bionator therapy.
    Malta LA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Faltin K; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19852634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I--The hard tissues.
    Illing HM; Morris DO; Lee RT
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):501-16. PubMed ID: 9825553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cephalometric evaluation of dento-skeletal changes during treatment with the Bionator type 1.
    Carels C; Reychler A; van der Linden FP
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Nov; 24(11):841-8. PubMed ID: 9426166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cephalometric markers to consider in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the bionator.
    Ahn SJ; Kim JT; Nahm DS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):578-86. PubMed ID: 11395700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment.
    Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Feb; 85(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 6594053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mandibular response to orthodontic treatment with the Bionator appliance.
    Mamandras AH; Allen LP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 2301298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Morphometric analysis of long-term dentoskeletal effects induced by treatment with Balters bionator.
    Bigliazzi R; Franchi L; Bertoz AP; McNamara JA; Faltin K; Bertoz FA
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Sep; 85(5):790-8. PubMed ID: 25469744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longitudinal alteration of the occlusal plane and development of different dentoskeletal frames during growth.
    Tanaka EM; Sato S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):602.e1-11; discussion 602-3. PubMed ID: 18984389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.