These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24094178)

  • 21. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
    Sertgöz A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9484066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of crown-to-implant ratio on peri-implant stress: a finite element analysis.
    Verri FR; Batista VE; Santiago JF; Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Dec; 45():234-40. PubMed ID: 25491825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Finite element analysis studies of a metal-ceramic crown on a first premolar tooth.
    Proos KA; Swain MV; Ironside J; Steven GP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):521-7. PubMed ID: 12475155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vitro study of fracture load and fracture pattern of ceramic crowns: a finite element and fractography analysis.
    Campos RE; Soares CJ; Quagliatto PS; Soares PV; de Oliveira OB; Santos-Filho PC; Salazar-Marocho SM
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 21843228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
    Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Passivity versus unilateral angular misfit: evaluation of stress distribution on implant-supported single crowns: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Gomes EA; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Delben JA; Rocha EP; de Sousa EA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1683-7. PubMed ID: 21119400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of different mucosal resiliency and denture reline on stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissue during osseointegration. A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Bacchi A; Consani RL; Mesquita MF; dos Santos MB
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e833-7. PubMed ID: 21981046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
    Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of superstructure material on the stress distribution in mandibular full-arch implant-supported fixed dentures. A CT-based 3D-FEA.
    Ferreira MB; Barão VA; Faverani LP; Hipólito AC; Assunção WG
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Feb; 35():92-9. PubMed ID: 24411356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
    Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biomechanical comparison of implant retained fixed partial dentures with fiber reinforced composite versus conventional metal frameworks: a 3D FEA study.
    Erkmen E; Meriç G; Kurt A; Tunç Y; Eser A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Jan; 4(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 21094484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
    Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Silva GC; Mendonça JA; Lopes LR; Landre J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20369081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of cusp inclination on stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses. A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Falcón-Antenucci RM; Pellizzer EP; de Carvalho PS; Goiato MC; Noritomi PY
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Jul; 19(5):381-6. PubMed ID: 20345742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
    Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of the implant diameter with different sizes of hexagon: analysis by 3-dimensional finite element method.
    Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; de Moraes SL; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Noritomi PY
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Aug; 39(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 21463183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.