These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24094178)

  • 41. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.
    Magne P; Belser UC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Corono-radicular reconstruction of pulpless teeth: a mechanical study using finite element analysis.
    Pierrisnard L; Bohin F; Renault P; Barquins M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 12447223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The influence of various occlusal materials on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: a three-dimensional finite-element study.
    Sevimay M; Usumez A; Eskitascioglu G
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2005 Apr; 73(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 15742379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Finite element analysis of stress in bone adjacent to dental implants.
    Rubo JH; Souza EA
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(5):248-55. PubMed ID: 19170290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Biomechanical comparison of two different collar structured implants supporting 3-unit fixed partial denture: a 3-D FEM study.
    Meriç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; Ozden AU
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Jan; 70(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 21732740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Numerical simulation of the effect of time-to-loading on peri-implant bone.
    Akça K; Eser A; Canay S
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 19864171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
    Atieh MA; Shahmiri RA
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21905902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The influence of different core material on the FEA-determined stress distribution in dental crowns.
    De Jager N; de Kler M; van der Zel JM
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 16099031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio, retention system, restorative material, and occlusal loading on stress concentrations in single short implants.
    Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; da Silva WJ; Rocha EP; Del Bel Cury AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):e13-8. PubMed ID: 22616067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Finite element analysis of 2 immediate loading systems in edentulous mandible: rigid and semirigid splinting of implants.
    Teixeira MF; Ramalho SA; de Mattias Sartori IA; Lehmann RB
    Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20147815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of metal-ceramic or all-ceramic superstructure materials on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Gomes ÉA; Barão VA; Rocha EP; de Almeida ÉO; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1202-9. PubMed ID: 22167424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Selection of the distraction implant length with improved biomechanical properties by three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Gao J; Li T; Hou XC; Wang Z; Kong L; Chen JH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Apr; 38(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 20819137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Bivariate evaluation of cylinder implant diameter and length: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kong L; Sun Y; Hu K; Li D; Hou R; Yang J; Liu B
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 18205741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Impact of dental and zygomatic implants on stress distribution in maxillary defects: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis study.
    Korkmaz FM; Korkmaz YT; Yaluğ S; Korkmaz T
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):557-67. PubMed ID: 20925533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Force transmission of one- and two-piece morse-taper oral implants: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 15248884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.