BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24094628)

  • 1. Simulation of realistic linac motion improves the accuracy of a Monte Carlo based VMAT plan QA system.
    Boylan CJ; Aitkenhead AH; Rowbottom CG; Mackay RI
    Radiother Oncol; 2013 Dec; 109(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 24094628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility of a GATE Monte Carlo platform in a clinical pretreatment QA system for VMAT treatment plans using TrueBeam with an HD120 multileaf collimator.
    Lee B; Jeong S; Chung K; Yoon M; Park HC; Han Y; Jung SH
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):101-110. PubMed ID: 31544350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
    Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
    Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
    Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Secondary monitor unit calculations for VMAT using parallelized Monte Carlo simulations.
    Bhagroo S; French SB; Mathews JA; Nazareth DP
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):60-69. PubMed ID: 31127699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monte Carlo based, patient-specific RapidArc QA using Linac log files.
    Teke T; Bergman AM; Kwa W; Gill B; Duzenli C; Popescu IA
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):116-23. PubMed ID: 20175472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc delivery using COMPASS.
    Vikraman S; Manigandan D; Karrthick KP; Sambasivaselli R; Senniandavar V; Ramu M; Rajesh T; Lutz M; Muthukumaran M; Karthikeyan N; Tejinder K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 16(1):5128. PubMed ID: 25679152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment verification using Varian's dynalog files in the Monte Carlo system PRIMO.
    Rodriguez M; Brualla L
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Apr; 14(1):67. PubMed ID: 31014356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of a Geant4 based Monte Carlo Algorithm to evaluate the MONACO VMAT treatment accuracy.
    Fleckenstein J; Jahnke L; Lohr F; Wenz F; Hesser J
    Z Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 23(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 22921843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental verification of 4D Monte Carlo simulations of dose delivery to a moving anatomy.
    Gholampourkashi S; Vujicic M; Belec J; Cygler JE; Heath E
    Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):299-310. PubMed ID: 28102956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement comparison and Monte Carlo analysis for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery verification using the ArcCHECK dosimetry system.
    Lin MH; Koren S; Veltchev I; Li J; Wang L; Price RA; Ma CM
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(2):3929. PubMed ID: 23470927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and clinical application of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose verification module and software for 1.5 T MR-LINAC.
    Cheng B; Xu Y; Li S; Ren Q; Pei X; Men K; Dai J; Xu XG
    Med Phys; 2023 May; 50(5):3172-3183. PubMed ID: 36862110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Moving GPU-OpenCL-based Monte Carlo dose calculation toward clinical use: Automatic beam commissioning and source sampling for treatment plan dose calculation.
    Tian Z; Li Y; Hassan-Rezaeian N; Jiang SB; Jia X
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):69-84. PubMed ID: 28300376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vivo dose verification method for SBRT-VMAT delivery using the EPID.
    McCowan PM; Van Uytven E; Van Beek T; Asuni G; McCurdy BM
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6955-63. PubMed ID: 26632051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of phantom-based and log file patient-specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT.
    Agnew CE; Irvine DM; McGarry CK
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):4994. PubMed ID: 25493524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical introduction of a linac head-mounted 2D detector array based quality assurance system in head and neck IMRT.
    Korevaar EW; Wauben DJ; van der Hulst PC; Langendijk JA; Van't Veld AA
    Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 21963288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the Impact of the Linac MLC and Gantry Sag in volumetric modulated arc therapy.
    Milan T; Grogan G; Ebert MA; Rowshanfarzad P
    Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):1984-1994. PubMed ID: 30870581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Texture analysis on the fluence map to evaluate the degree of modulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy.
    Park SY; Kim IH; Ye SJ; Carlson J; Park JM
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111718. PubMed ID: 25370632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 4D dose simulation in volumetric arc therapy: Accuracy and affecting parameters.
    Sothmann T; Gauer T; Werner R
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172810. PubMed ID: 28231337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Online adaptation and verification of VMAT.
    Crijns W; Defraene G; Van Herck H; Depuydt T; Haustermans K; Maes F; Van den Heuvel F
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3877-91. PubMed ID: 26133589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.