622 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24094717)
1. Minimally invasive compared with open lumbar laminotomy: no functional benefits at 6 or 24 months after surgery.
Ang CL; Phak-Boon Tow B; Fook S; Guo CM; Chen JL; Yue WM; Tan SB
Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1705-12. PubMed ID: 24094717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of minimally invasive decompression alone versus minimally invasive short-segment fusion in the setting of adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Echt M; Bakare AA; Varela JR; Platt A; Abdul Sami M; Molenda J; Kerolus M; Fessler RG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Sep; 39(3):394-403. PubMed ID: 37327145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral laminotomy or total laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-institution experience.
Pietrantonio A; Trungu S; Famà I; Forcato S; Miscusi M; Raco A
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E2. PubMed ID: 31042648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of full-endoscopic and minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in the setting of degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.
Hasan S; McGrath LB; Sen RD; Barber JK; Hofstetter CP
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E16. PubMed ID: 31042656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study.
Seng C; Siddiqui MA; Wong KP; Zhang K; Yeo W; Tan SB; Yue WM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):2049-55. PubMed ID: 23963015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraoperative reduction does not result in better outcomes in low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with neurogenic symptoms after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-a 5-year follow-up study.
Tay KS; Bassi A; Yeo W; Yue WM
Spine J; 2016 Feb; 16(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 26515392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.
Wang MY; Vasudevan R; Mindea SA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 25303619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mid-term clinical results of minimally invasive decompression and posterolateral fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws versus conventional approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis.
Kotani Y; Abumi K; Ito M; Sudo H; Abe Y; Minami A
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21(6):1171-7. PubMed ID: 22173610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of PROMIS in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary evaluation.
Haws BE; Khechen B; Guntin JA; Cardinal KL; Bohl DD; Singh K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jul; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 29652236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.
Thomé C; Zevgaridis D; Leheta O; Bäzner H; Pöckler-Schöniger C; Wöhrle J; Schmiedek P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Aug; 3(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 16370302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Three-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Fan G; Wu X; Yu S; Sun Q; Guan X; Zhang H; Gu X; He S
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():9540298. PubMed ID: 27747244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
