These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24095108)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of dental resin composites based on micron- and submicron-sized monomodal glass filler particles.
    Valente LL; Peralta SL; Ogliari FA; Cavalcante LM; Moraes RR
    Dent Mater; 2013 Nov; 29(11):1182-7. PubMed ID: 24095108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of mechanical properties in dental resin composite: Effect of filler size and filler aggregation state.
    Rodríguez HA; Kriven WM; Casanova H
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Aug; 101():274-282. PubMed ID: 31029321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Isolated effect of filler particle size on surface properties of experimental resin composites before and after toothbrush abrasion.
    Kobayashi M; Koi K; Wiskoski S; Watanabe H; Lewis S; Ferracane JL
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Dec; 35(8):1286-1292. PubMed ID: 37449726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interface effects on mechanical properties of particle-reinforced composites.
    Debnath S; Ranade R; Wunder SL; McCool J; Boberick K; Baran G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Sep; 20(7):677-86. PubMed ID: 15236943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the filler packing structures in dental resin composites: From theory to practice.
    Wang R; Habib E; Zhu XX
    Dent Mater; 2018 Jul; 34(7):1014-1023. PubMed ID: 29673709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of flexural properties and surface roughness of nanohybrid and microhybrid dental composites.
    Melander J; Dunn WP; Link MP; Wang Y; Xu C; Walker MP
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(5):342-7; quiz 348-9. PubMed ID: 22313818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Synthesis of core-shell structured ZnO@m-SiO
    Chen H; Wang R; Zhang J; Hua H; Zhu M
    Dent Mater; 2018 Dec; 34(12):1846-1855. PubMed ID: 30482610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of metal-resin composite restorative material. Part 2. Effects of acid and heat treatments of silver-tin filler particles on flexural properties of metal-resin composite.
    Urapepon S; Kakuta K; Miyagawa Y; Ogura H; Suchatlampong C; Rittapai A
    Dent Mater J; 1999 Jun; 18(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 10786127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: characterizing discrete filler particles and agglomerates using a micromanipulation technique.
    Curtis AR; Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Shortall AC; Marquis PM
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 18656254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of particle variation on wear rates of posterior composites.
    Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF; Kawai K; Tsuchitani Y
    Am J Dent; 1995 Aug; 8(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 7576382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of silanated filler content on the biodegradation of bisGMA/TEGDMA dental composite resins.
    Finer Y; Santerre JP
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Apr; 81(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 17109416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of filler charge on gloss of composite materials before and after in vitro toothbrushing.
    Jassé FF; de Campos EA; Lefever D; Di Bella E; Salomon JP; Krejci I; Ardu S
    J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41 Suppl 5():e41-4. PubMed ID: 23649047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface Properties of Resin Composites and CAD/CAM Blocks After Simulated Toothbrushing.
    Suzuki M; Miyano Y; Sato F; Shinkai K
    Oper Dent; 2023 Sep; 48(5):575-587. PubMed ID: 37635455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture toughness and cyclic fatigue resistance of resin composites with different filler size distributions.
    Ornaghi BP; Meier MM; Lohbauer U; Braga RR
    Dent Mater; 2014 Jul; 30(7):742-51. PubMed ID: 24857163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of short glass fiber/filler particle proportion on flexural and diametral tensile strength of a novel fiber-reinforced composite.
    Fonseca RB; de Almeida LN; Mendes GA; Kasuya AV; Favarão IN; de Paula MS
    J Prosthodont Res; 2016 Jan; 60(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 26589845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Ohmiti K; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2010 Apr; 26(4):306-19. PubMed ID: 20036418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/bis-GMA fiber-reinforced resin posts.
    Soares CJ; Santana FR; Pereira JC; Araujo TS; Menezes MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 18514666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites.
    Turssi CP; Ferracane JL; Vogel K
    Biomaterials; 2005 Aug; 26(24):4932-7. PubMed ID: 15769527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical strength of resin composite versus glass ceramic materials.
    Lohbauer U; Müller FA; Petschelt A
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 17628659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.