600 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24095213)
1. Influence of adhesive techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with various residual wall thicknesses.
Scotti N; Rota R; Scansetti M; Paolino DS; Chiandussi G; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 24095213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin.
Mohammadi N; Kahnamoii MA; Yeganeh PK; Navimipour EJ
J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH
Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strengthening effect of horizontally placed fiberglass posts in endodontically-treated teeth restored with direct resin composite.
Favero FJ; De Melo TA; Stona D; Mota EG; Spohr AM; Burnett LH
Am J Dent; 2015 Jun; 28(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 26201225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of two types of composite fibers on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars: an in vitro study.
Oskoee PA; Chaharom ME; Kimyai S; Oskoee JS; Varasteh S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jan; 12(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 22186687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber reinforced posts and cast gold post and cores cemented with three cements.
Torres-Sánchez C; Montoya-Salazar V; Córdoba P; Vélez C; Guzmán-Duran A; Gutierrez-Pérez JL; Torres-Lagares D
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23929374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically-treated maxillary premolars.
Oskoee SS; Oskoee PA; Navimipour EJ; Shahi S
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):510-4. PubMed ID: 17910229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of resin-based materials on fracture resistance of endodontically treated thin-walled teeth.
Balkaya MC; Birdal IS
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):296-303. PubMed ID: 23684279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of the post length and cusp coverage on the cycling and static load of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
Scotti N; Scansetti M; Rota R; Pera F; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):923-9. PubMed ID: 20830497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of resin cements and aging on cuspal deflection and fracture resistance of teeth restored with composite resin inlays.
Salaverry A; Borges GA; Mota EG; Burnett Júnior LH; Spohr AM
J Adhes Dent; 2013 Dec; 15(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 23653900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods.
Mergulhão VA; de Mendonça LS; de Albuquerque MS; Braz R
Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 30715998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of composite fiber insertion along with low-shrinking composite resin on cuspal deflection of root-filled maxillary premolars.
Oskoee SS; Oskoee PA; Navimipour EJ; Ajami AA; Zonuz GA; Bahari M; Pournaghiazar F
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 13(5):595-601. PubMed ID: 23250159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
