These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

606 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24095213)

  • 41. Influence of cavity design and restorative material on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Cubas GB; Camacho GB; Pereira-Cenci T; Nonaka T; Barbin EL
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):e84-8. PubMed ID: 20236909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with combined composite-amalgam restorations.
    Geiger S; Paikin L; Gorfil C; Gordon M
    Quintessence Int; 2008 Feb; 39(2):e58-62. PubMed ID: 18560642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Thickness of CAD-CAM composite resin overlays influences fatigue resistance of endodontically treated premolars.
    Magne P; Knezevic A
    Dent Mater; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1264-8. PubMed ID: 19539358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of post-retained composite restoration of MOD preparations on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
    Sorrentino R; Salameh Z; Zarone F; Tay FR; Ferrari M
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Feb; 9(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 17432401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effect of post material on the characteristic strength of fatigued endodontically treated teeth.
    Pereira JR; do Valle AL; Shiratori FK; Ghizoni JS; Bonfante EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1225-30. PubMed ID: 24836285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of different cusp coverage restorations on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Serin Kalay T; Yildirim T; Ulker M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):404-10. PubMed ID: 27086106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations.
    de V Habekost L; Camacho GB; Azevedo EC; Demarco FF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 17854619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of the length of glass fiber posts on the fracture resistance of restored maxillary central incisors.
    Borelli B; Sorrentino R; Zarone F; Ferrari M
    Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 22779280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Performance of techniques used for re-attachment of endodontically treated crown fractured teeth.
    Loguercio AD; Leski G; Sossmeier D; Kraul A; Oda M; Patzlaff RT; Reis A
    J Dent; 2008 Apr; 36(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 18308450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Strain measurements and fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with all-ceramic restorations.
    Seow LL; Toh CG; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 2015 Jan; 43(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 25448436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Placement of fiber prefabricated or custom made posts affects the 3-year survival of endodontically treated premolars.
    Cagidiaco MC; García-Godoy F; Vichi A; Grandini S; Goracci C; Ferrari M
    Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 18686771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):724-30. PubMed ID: 19581032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth restored with different strategies after mechanical cycling.
    Rosa R; Hwas A; Melo D; Valandro LF; Kaizer O
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(2):e62-8. PubMed ID: 22414519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
    Desai PD; Das UK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
    Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
    J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of structurally compromised canals restored with different dowel methods.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Miglani S; Kohli S
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 22339985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Three-year clinical evaluation of cuspal coverage with combined composite-amalgam in endodontically-treated maxillary premolars.
    Shafiei F; Memarpour M; Doozandeh M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 21179997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of fiber posts on the fracture resistance of maxillary central incisors with Class III restorations: An in vitro study.
    Abduljawad M; Samran A; Kadour J; Karzoun W; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27863859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Optimizing fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with preheated thermos-viscous composite post-thermocycling, a comparative study. Part I.
    Abdel-Maksoud HB; Eid BM; Hamdy M; Abdelaal HM
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):295. PubMed ID: 38431585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.