177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24095780)
1. Post-zygotic breakage of a dicentric chromosome results in mosaicism for a telocentric 9p marker chromosome in a boy with developmental delay.
Pedurupillay CR; Misceo D; Gamage TH; Dissanayake VH; Frengen E
Gene; 2014 Jan; 533(1):403-10. PubMed ID: 24095780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Independent post-zygotic breaks of a dicentric chromosome result in mosaicism for an inverted duplication deletion 9p and terminal deletion 9p.
Schlade-Bartusiak K; Tucker T; Safavi H; Livingston J; van Allen MI; Eydoux P; Armstrong L
Eur J Med Genet; 2013 May; 56(5):229-35. PubMed ID: 23416622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Telomere capture as a frequent mechanism for stabilization of the terminal chromosomal deletion associated with inverted duplication.
Yu S; Graf WD
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2010; 129(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 20606397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Molecular characterisation of a mosaicism with a complex chromosome rearrangement: evidence for coincident chromosome healing by telomere capture and neo-telomere formation.
Chabchoub E; Rodríguez L; Galán E; Mansilla E; Martínez-Fernandez ML; Martínez-Frías ML; Fryns JP; Vermeesch JR
J Med Genet; 2007 Apr; 44(4):250-6. PubMed ID: 17172463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inv dup del(9p): prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization by fluorescence in situ hybridization and array comparative genomic hybridization.
Chen CP; Su YN; Chern SR; Hsu CY; Tsai FJ; Wu PC; Lee CC; Chen YT; Lee MS; Wang W
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 50(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 21482378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The embryo battle against adverse genomes: Are de novo terminal deletions the rescue of unfavorable zygotic imbalances?
Zuffardi O; Fichera M; Bonaglia MC
Eur J Med Genet; 2022 Aug; 65(8):104532. PubMed ID: 35724817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inv dup(22), del(22)(q11) and r(22) in the father of a child with DiGeorge syndrome.
Bergman A; Blennow E
Eur J Hum Genet; 2000 Oct; 8(10):801-4. PubMed ID: 11039583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. U-type exchange is the most frequent mechanism for inverted duplication with terminal deletion rearrangements.
Rowe LR; Lee JY; Rector L; Kaminsky EB; Brothman AR; Martin CL; South ST
J Med Genet; 2009 Oct; 46(10):694-702. PubMed ID: 19293169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unusual 8p inverted duplication deletion with telomere capture from 8q.
Buysse K; Antonacci F; Callewaert B; Loeys B; Fränkel U; Siu V; Mortier G; Speleman F; Menten B
Eur J Med Genet; 2009; 52(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 19041960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inv dup del(10q): identification by fluorescence in situ hybridization and array comparative genomic hybridization in a fetus with two concurrent chromosomal rearrangements.
Chen CP; Chen M; Su YN; Huang JP; Ma GC; Chang SP; Chern SR; Chen YT; Su JW; Lee CC; Town DD; Wang W
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 51(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 22795102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inverted duplications: how many of them are mosaic?
Pramparo T; Giglio S; Gregato G; de Gregori M; Patricelli MG; Ciccone R; Scappaticci S; Mannino G; Lombardi C; Pirola B; Giorda R; Rocchi M; Zuffardi O
Eur J Hum Genet; 2004 Sep; 12(9):713-7. PubMed ID: 15266302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The involvement of U-type dicentric chromosomes in the formation of terminal deletions with or without adjacent inverted duplications.
Kato T; Inagaki H; Miyai S; Suzuki F; Naru Y; Shinkai Y; Kato A; Kanyama K; Mizuno S; Muramatsu Y; Yamamoto T; Shinya M; Tazaki Y; Hiwatashi S; Ikeda T; Ozaki M; Kurahashi H
Hum Genet; 2020 Nov; 139(11):1417-1427. PubMed ID: 32488466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of the first reported case of inv dup del 20p compatible with a U-type exchange model.
Leclercq S; Maincent K; Baverel F; Tessier DL; Letourneur F; Lebbar A; Dupont JM
Am J Med Genet A; 2009 Mar; 149A(3):437-45. PubMed ID: 19206177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two mosaic terminal inverted duplications arising post-zygotically: Evidence for possible formation of neo-telomeres.
Daniel A; St Heaps L; Sylvester D; Diaz S; Peters G
Cell Chromosome; 2008 Mar; 7():1. PubMed ID: 18331649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inverted duplications deletions: underdiagnosed rearrangements??
Zuffardi O; Bonaglia M; Ciccone R; Giorda R
Clin Genet; 2009 Jun; 75(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 19508415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low-level complex mosaic with multiple cell lines affecting the 18q21.31q21.32 region in a patient with de novo 18q terminal deletion.
Bonaglia MC; Fichera M; Marelli S; Romaniello R; Zuffardi O
Eur J Med Genet; 2022 Nov; 65(11):104596. PubMed ID: 36064004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from chromosome 22 associated with cat eye syndrome.
Chen CP; Ko TM; Chen YY; Su JW; Wang W
Gene; 2013 Sep; 527(1):384-8. PubMed ID: 23747353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 17p11.2p12 triplication and del(17)q11.2q12 in a severely affected child with dup(17)p11.2p12 syndrome.
Girirajan S; Williams S; Garbern J; Nowak N; Hatchwell E; Elsea S
Clin Genet; 2007 Jul; 72(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 17594399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Duplications in addition to terminal deletions are present in a proportion of ring chromosomes: clues to the mechanisms of formation.
Rossi E; Riegel M; Messa J; Gimelli S; Maraschio P; Ciccone R; Stroppi M; Riva P; Perrotta CS; Mattina T; Memo L; Baumer A; Kucinskas V; Castellan C; Schinzel A; Zuffardi O
J Med Genet; 2008 Mar; 45(3):147-54. PubMed ID: 18006671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ring chromosome formation as a novel escape mechanism in patients with inverted duplication and terminal deletion.
Knijnenburg J; van Haeringen A; Hansson KB; Lankester A; Smit MJ; Belfroid RD; Bakker E; Rosenberg C; Tanke HJ; Szuhai K
Eur J Hum Genet; 2007 May; 15(5):548-55. PubMed ID: 17342151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
